Espectro electromagnetico...?

Discussion concerning the first major re-evaluation of Dewey B. Larson's Reciprocal System of theory, updated to include counterspace (Etheric spaces), projective geometry, and the non-local aspects of time/space.
oreneorg
Posts: 175
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:58 pm

Espectro electromagnetico...?

Post by oreneorg » Sun Apr 13, 2014 10:43 am

Attachments
espectro electromagnetico.pdf
(52.43 KiB) Downloaded 146 times

oreneorg
Posts: 175
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:58 pm

? Espectro electromagnetico

Post by oreneorg » Sun Jun 15, 2014 12:51 pm

?

Espectro electromagnetico
Attachments
espectro electromagnetico.pdf
(52.43 KiB) Downloaded 173 times

oreneorg
Posts: 175
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:58 pm

doble interrelacion

Post by oreneorg » Sun Jun 22, 2014 10:37 am

It is assumed that not only double symmetric birrotacion be transformed into a photon in the material, but also sectro photons are "transformed" in the Counterspace as birrotaciones symmetrical ... no?
Attachments
doble interrelacion.pdf
(71.36 KiB) Downloaded 145 times

User avatar
bperet
Posts: 1491
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 1:43 am
Location: 7.5.3.84.70.24.606
Contact:

20 grados de libertad 22 + 23

Post by bperet » Sun Jun 22, 2014 12:29 pm

20 grados de libertad 22 + 23 + 23 = 20
Each mantissa "2" represents an axis, which is one degree of freedom. This should be 8 degrees of freedom (add the exponents). Origin of octave.
Every dogma has its day...

User avatar
bperet
Posts: 1491
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 1:43 am
Location: 7.5.3.84.70.24.606
Contact:

Dimensional heirarchy

Post by bperet » Sun Jun 22, 2014 12:42 pm

Que nos harian suponer que los tiempos t1; t2;t3 pertenecen a diferentes

niveles, que podriamos asociar de acuerdo al esoterismo con los tres niveles

superiores etericos que asociariamos (en esta hipotesis) al sector cosmico o

contraespacio:
That would make us assume that the times t1; t2, t3 belonging to different
levels, we could associate with esoteric according to the three levels
higher etheric would associate (in this hypothesis) the cosmic sector or
Counterspace:
It is a 3D coordinate system in time. The levels would be:
  1. (t1 OR t2 OR t3) -- line
  2. (t1 AND t2) OR (t2 AND t3) OR (t1 AND t3) -- plane
  3. t1 AND t2 AND t3 -- volume
It is the number of non-unity dimensions of "motion" that creates the structure.

The cosmic sector can only be measured by its net motion on the material sector, so we only see a single temporal dimension: clock time f(d,e,f,t).

The reciprocal is also true. The cosmic sector sees clock space: f(d,t1,t2,t3) -- the quaternion.
Every dogma has its day...

oreneorg
Posts: 175
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:58 pm

8 grados de libertad

Post by oreneorg » Thu Jun 26, 2014 2:06 pm

Sorry 8 grados de libertad (8*8=64)
Attachments
cosmico-material.pdf
(14.63 KiB) Downloaded 152 times

oreneorg
Posts: 175
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:58 pm

Nomenclature?

Post by oreneorg » Thu Jul 03, 2014 11:39 am

Nomenclature?
Attachments
NOMENCLATURE..pdf
(56.21 KiB) Downloaded 142 times

oreneorg
Posts: 175
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:58 pm

Because there is an association between ionizing radiation and r

Post by oreneorg » Sat Jul 12, 2014 3:43 pm

Because there is an association between ionizing radiation and radiation in Counterspace?.
Attachments
frecuencia maxima-minima espectro em.pdf
(77.31 KiB) Downloaded 167 times

oreneorg
Posts: 175
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:58 pm

Because there is an association between ionizing radiation and r

Post by oreneorg » Sat Jul 12, 2014 4:00 pm

Because there is an association between ionizing radiation and r




Because there is an association between ionizing radiation and radiation in Counterspace?.
Attachments
frecuencia maxima-minima espectro em2.pdf
(73.58 KiB) Downloaded 142 times

oreneorg
Posts: 175
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:58 pm

Plank time

Post by oreneorg » Sun Jul 13, 2014 3:05 am

Plank time, it is a bit out of the electromagnetic system of reciprocal minimum time.
Attachments
Tiempo de Plank.pdf
(52.94 KiB) Downloaded 167 times

Post Reply