possible use for deadly experiment
-
Walter Webb
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:33 pm
possible use for deadly experiment
I recently viewed the RS2 lectures. There were two references to deadly free-energy experiments. Maybe it will work on biological agents like anthrax.
Life and Death
One of the problems with conventional physics is that they do not consider the larger picture--only the inanimate realm. The energy derived from these machines appears "free" because it is breaking down biological energy into chemical energy (your body does the opposite--it takes chemical energy and builds biological energy). So it DOES have a price--to use these devices cost you your life. It stems from the structure of life units (see Larson's Beyond Space and Time), where a life unit is composed of a material structure bound to a cosmic structure, analogous to a stable matter-antimatter reaction. That produces a LOT of energy. If that energy is tapped off, the life units will decompose back to their component parts (life normally does that--called a "lifetime", but this greatly hastens the process).
Life, of course, is not "localized". The patterns of life work like thermal ionization--heat something up, and it spreads to warm everything around it. Life does the same--a strong life pattern will encourage the growth of more life surrounding it, hence life spreads out (unlike gravity, that pulls in). If one were to employ a "death technology", even with the aims of killing disease, it will create a chain reaction--just like freezing a spot. The cold will spread through ionization, and make all the surrounding areas colder. Death isn't just the absence of life--like life, it is a process by which life units are converted back to inanimate status.
Certain substances are meant to die. For example, your "excrement" contains life and energy when it comes out, but rapidly dies off to go back to the inanimate realm to become chemical fertilizer to promote life. Even the natural death of the entire body does that when you reach the point of death at old age (the life energy or prana field has almost collapsed).
Anthrax is a life form... does it not also have a right to live? It does not kill out of vindictiveness or anger, it's just making food--exactly the same way we do, by killing plants and animals. Only difference is, in the anthrax case, we are the animals being slaughtered.
Nutrition, though it involves death, does not reduce the overall life ionization level--because the life is consumed and the energy released increases the energy of another organism, with the waste going back to fertilizer. It is a positive cycle.
Consider the use of technology to cause death... the life energy is dissipated, not used, and the remains tend to rot rather than decay to fertilizer. Nature tries to compensate through predation--other life comes to eat the remains, like bacteria and parasites, to try to reclaim the energy before it is gone. The predators increase massively in number, run out of food, then go hunting for more food--if they cannot find it, they will make it.
I can not see any good coming from using any form of technology to cause death, particularly through the breaking down of the pranic field (life units). Humanity does too much of that already, which is why we the need for "energy" is growing to outrageous proportions.
If you want to get rid of anthrax, take the natural route--find a predator--something that will eat it and use its death to promote life. Our bodies are already full of predators. We just call them "white blood cells."
Conventional science says you cannot have "free energy" because of the laws of conservation of energy. It says a similar thing in the Reciprocal System--the law of conservation of motion. Energy only appears "free" because it is being extracted from a region (time) that is not directly observable by our measuring instruments. Just because we cannot see the consequences of that extraction of energy, does not mean there are not any. That's why we have RS2--to help see the larger picture and to predict those consequences before they become a surprising reality.
Life, of course, is not "localized". The patterns of life work like thermal ionization--heat something up, and it spreads to warm everything around it. Life does the same--a strong life pattern will encourage the growth of more life surrounding it, hence life spreads out (unlike gravity, that pulls in). If one were to employ a "death technology", even with the aims of killing disease, it will create a chain reaction--just like freezing a spot. The cold will spread through ionization, and make all the surrounding areas colder. Death isn't just the absence of life--like life, it is a process by which life units are converted back to inanimate status.
Certain substances are meant to die. For example, your "excrement" contains life and energy when it comes out, but rapidly dies off to go back to the inanimate realm to become chemical fertilizer to promote life. Even the natural death of the entire body does that when you reach the point of death at old age (the life energy or prana field has almost collapsed).
Anthrax is a life form... does it not also have a right to live? It does not kill out of vindictiveness or anger, it's just making food--exactly the same way we do, by killing plants and animals. Only difference is, in the anthrax case, we are the animals being slaughtered.
Nutrition, though it involves death, does not reduce the overall life ionization level--because the life is consumed and the energy released increases the energy of another organism, with the waste going back to fertilizer. It is a positive cycle.
Consider the use of technology to cause death... the life energy is dissipated, not used, and the remains tend to rot rather than decay to fertilizer. Nature tries to compensate through predation--other life comes to eat the remains, like bacteria and parasites, to try to reclaim the energy before it is gone. The predators increase massively in number, run out of food, then go hunting for more food--if they cannot find it, they will make it.
I can not see any good coming from using any form of technology to cause death, particularly through the breaking down of the pranic field (life units). Humanity does too much of that already, which is why we the need for "energy" is growing to outrageous proportions.
If you want to get rid of anthrax, take the natural route--find a predator--something that will eat it and use its death to promote life. Our bodies are already full of predators. We just call them "white blood cells."
Conventional science says you cannot have "free energy" because of the laws of conservation of energy. It says a similar thing in the Reciprocal System--the law of conservation of motion. Energy only appears "free" because it is being extracted from a region (time) that is not directly observable by our measuring instruments. Just because we cannot see the consequences of that extraction of energy, does not mean there are not any. That's why we have RS2--to help see the larger picture and to predict those consequences before they become a surprising reality.
Every dogma has its day...