KanDrico wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 11:38 am
If I understand your answer correctly, and combined with my understating of the books, the "reciprocal universe" can be seen as one where:
1. Every particle/"element"/motion has a 3D space/time relationship to all other elements, which is independent of the coordinate system we experience.
Essentially, yes, every particle/atom IS motion in coordinate
time (counterspace) or more properly: temporal (yin) rotational-based structure at a spatial (yang) linear-based location -- the "point". (Although there is a real radius as defined through concepts such as mass, density, and volume, the gravity, defined as the "center" of gravity, acts through a "point".)
The true, underlying
scalar motions cannot be directly observed except through a series of assumptive applications which transform the scalar motion of
no geometry to an
equivalent geometry -- imparting critical geometric relationships -- in 3D coordinate space (Larson’s extension space): Projective → Affine → metric (or similar) → Euclidean
There are at least two (2)
coordinate systems: (3D)
coordinate space + clock time & (3D)
coordinate time + clock space
The Natural Reference System (NRS) is not a coordinate system, per se.
The reciprocal (inverse) region to the time-space region (TSR) is the time region (TR) and the inverse region to the space-time region (STR) is the space region (SR). So there are four (4) regions and the TSR and STR are
conjugates as are the TR and SR conjugates (
not inverses). There are also two flavors of
inverse conjugates: TSR-to-SR, and STR-to-TR. TSR is what conventional legacy science recognizes as space-time; STR should be time-space or else all the anti-matter (really, inverse-matter) has no domain!
These are
speed regions: TSR is ‘1-x’, TR is ‘2-x’ (or inverse '3-x'), SR is ‘3-x’ (or inverse '2-x'), and STR is inverse ‘1-x’ although the speed associated with each region would be be pinned circular round-robin style to each of the other regions i.e. in keeping such that the region of the observer is the Low Speed Region (1-x). Our view is from the TSR and those things we call particles and atoms are all counter-spatial (FTL) motion in the TR (i.e. motion within a 'quanta' of space -- unit space -- where motion is entirely
in time).
KanDrico wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 11:38 am
2. We perceive those space distances as Cartesian, aided by some mental translation process, which in some instances can defy the balloon analogy. ie. it allows the "center" to expand at the same absolute rate as the periphery.
Yes, all distances (and durations) -- including inverse distances (1/s --
shift, bounded as the concept of separation in ‘phase angle’) and inverse durations (1/t --
turn, bounded as the concept of ‘frequency’) -- are but abated
aspects of scalar motion in the representative [coordinate] system that we perceive (i.e.
create) -- that of (3D) coordinate space + clock time or the conjugate, (3D) coordinate time + clock space, if you happen to possess that particular skill. Some of us do.
More to that point, the Cartesian (Euclidean) coordinate system IS
your perception. These two [coordinate] systems are captured using Homogeneous coordinates (3 speeds → distances plus scalar for scaling time) and Quaternions (3 energies → durations plus scalar for scaling space). Reciprocal.
The expansion (progression) is from all "points" in space (
everywhere) and from all planes in time (
everywhen). You're attempting to scale the whole of the universe as if it were one, giant particle. Realize instead that space and time are
discrete quantities like the pixels on your LCD/LED screen (except here we expect you to think in 3D, not 1D -- i.e. "Electric" Universe is the
shadow) and as such the progression ubiquitously occurs throughout all of time-space (and space-time). 3D means
scalar 3-
dimensionality not to be confused with
coordinate 3-dimensionality.
Neigh, it is the very
being of perception (consciousness) that continuously forms and provides for coordinate space (or coordinate time). If a tree falls in the woods, and there is nobody around to hear it, does it make a sound?...
NO.
bperet wrote: ↑Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:03 pm
So better ask Bruce how does one hydrogen atom appear to another and it will be possible for him to answer you meaningfuly.
This is a very important point--what we observe is defined by INTERACTION. For example, the photon out by itself is NEITHER a wave nor a particle... it's just a speed. Only during its interaction does observation give it geometric structure, since geometry is an "artificial reality" of man, based on Man's Law--commandments of the way things are to behave.
When the photon interacts with something and has a net motion in space, it shows up as a particle, since space is point-based. If that same photon interacts with something else like a force field, the net motion in time, and it is observed as a wave, since time plane-based and rotational. Once the interaction is over, it's "anything goes" again.
It is the ACT of conscious perception which "translates" these scalar motions into what we call objective reality. Our consciousness must halt the scalar expansion
s (and various scalar contraction
s) through normalization to
clock time to create a
static projection from a larger, containing
dynamic construct.
bperet wrote: ↑Fri Jul 19, 2013 9:02 am
Normalizing space to unit clock time is the concept of density. We see that with the inter-atomic distances that Larson calculates in BPOM. Any time the Inter-regional ratio is involved, you're normalizing to a unit "degree of freedom."
When you normalize time to "unit rotation," then you're taking a temporal volume and compressing it into this concept we call mass, which we can then use to measure its effect on space.
The
Suprachiasmatic Nuclei (SCN) and the Pineal Gland in our brains are our biological hardware necessary to phase-lock data transmission clocks - just like the [
PLL] clock generator (oscillator) used on EVERY digital data transfer system since the advent of digital electronics. The
system is designed to operate very similar to how a gyroscopic navigational system works for undersea piloting -- by the fixing/tracking of 3D coordinate location data through the integration and subsequent on-going summation of an already-once integrated, set of equal-but-opposite "directions" of instantaneous accelerations as sensed in three (3) orthogonal dimensions, with periodic synchronization to an external Master standard-keeper, like GPS or the occasional celestial fix, so as to maintain overall accuracy. Submarines. God (Source). Which one am I talking about? You don't know...
The universe is continuous motion at the Projective stratum yet becomes discrete units of measure when the scalar motions are
projected into equivalent space (or equivalent time). Each of the individual atoms that make up our picture of reality, shall we call it, are in and of themselves each scalar motions
projected into space at/from a "point".
Don't scale the big picture; individually-scale the individual piece-parts (photons, particles, atoms,
etc.).
KanDrico wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 11:38 am
Also, a few more questions:
1. You said no geometry except a projective one.
No geometry at the
Projective stratum -- I suppose this makes the moniker Projective Geometry rather ironic, right? There is "geometry" insofar as it can be diagramed as "geometry" on paper but is in actuality a formalization of geometric
concepts to
conceptualize purely mathematical structures into form through application of layered assumption.
PG is the very origin of [coordinate] geometry and provides for the concepts of
distance (between a pair of "points") and (relative)
angle between a pair of planes
in space &
turn (between a pair of planes) and (relative)
shift between a pair of "points"
in time (counterspace). Reciprocal ("points" ↔ planes).
None of the scalar dimensions are directly observable. It is the
net motion of the combination of the 3 scalar dimensions which are projected into equivalent space which is decidedly recti-Euclidean (as opposed to polar-Euclidean for equivalent time).
KanDrico wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 11:38 am
Does this mean that a particle/motion can change in an "external", unobservable dimension, then get projected into our physical one?
Oh, absolutely. An example would be what legacy science deems the "quantum foam". Nothing is "popping" in or out of existence -- rather the
perspective is changing and an observable
in space is the result.
KanDrico wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 11:38 am
2. If the balloon isn't an adequate analogy, what alternative would you suggest?
Let's hold this question for a moment and jump directly to the next question...
KanDrico wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 11:38 am
3. Again in the balloon analogy, would you say that the center expands "more that it should" in that extra dimension, then get scaled "back" when projected into our cartesian expectation? Does that idea even make sense?
You should now understand the expansion to be a
scalar expansion and not a Cartesian (Euclidean) expansion as the "stage" is but a summary
scalar motion projection into a static frame with clock time to tick away
vectoral motion.
With that being said, as the progression
in space is from all "points"
in space (down to the space between individual atoms) then it stands to reason that the more space, the more expansion. As such, the total/net displacement due the expansion would increase moving from the periphery (unit boundary) of the "bubble" (the 2D, distributed Snat)
outwards, towards the "point" at infinity (center). Outwards in time (1→∞) is inward in space (1→0).
This outward
temporal pressure is precisely analogous to gravity -- the spatial type as there
is also temporal gravity -- in that the
less the distance to a gravitating object (less intervening space), the
higher the "force of attraction” (lower overall cumulative space expansion when nominalized to unit time). This is just a speed contour curve gradient surrounding the body and is what we recognize as acceleration (due gravity) in coordinate space.
So, yes, the
equivalent motion is progressively 'scaled back' (as-in
scalar) -- that's what provides for the accelerative motion of a gravitational "field" (gravity is a
speed, mass is the field) as a result of normalization to unit clock time. Hold the total space
invariant and scale the "rate" of time (clock time) instead... relative
acceleration between two “points”. Scalar expansion in one aspect would be observed as a scalar contraction in the same regard when viewed from “opposite” sides (inside versus outside) of any unit boundary -- pushes become pulls and pulls become pushes. Good connection on your part.
Does this help?
You have a
good basis of primary understanding -- more closer to functionally correct than not.
The seed is planted and you are ready for growing.
Please continue if you think this helps...