Unity and Phi^3

Discussion concerning the first major re-evaluation of Dewey B. Larson's Reciprocal System of theory, updated to include counterspace (Etheric spaces), projective geometry, and the non-local aspects of time/space.
User avatar
ckiit
Posts: 56
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 7:54 am

Unity and Phi^3

Post by ckiit » Mon Jan 27, 2020 6:47 pm

EDIT 2020/02/26

This thread culminated into the derivation of a more precise calculation of π as shown here:
Image
Beginning with a circle whose diameter is √5,
place two unit squares inside of the circle side-by-side
(either horizontally or vertically, the latter is shown)
and find √5 as any diagonal between two opposite corners (AB shown).
Note: this diagonal is equal to the diameter of the circle as √5.
Add 1 unit distance (BC shown) to this diagonal and find the midpoint (D shown)
such to satisfy (√5+1)/2 as (AB+BC)/D wherein D effectively halves AC.
By rotating the √5 diagonal about the origin of the circle we began with,
the midpoint (D) incessantly coincides with the circle whose diameter is 2r = 1
and "kisses" the unit square four times equidistantly, thus a more precise π
can be measured directly by way of Φ expressed as a ratio of Φ.

This ratio is 4/√Φ and/or (8√5-8)1/2
and elaborated on page 3.

Concerning:
Image
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler_triangle

I am unsure as to the motive for the above, but the construction of the geometry
is conceptually unsound: concerning the same Kepler triangle, a circle that circumscribes it
completely ignores the imperative need for the diameter of the circle to be √5, the same to which
the Kepler triangle must apply. If the circle is not √5, there is no valid coupling and π remains 'transcendental'
however if coupled to the √5 diameter circle (as shown), the coupled relation permits a geometry
whose co-operation between Φ and π are respectively reflected in the following:

Φ solves for
f(x) = x² - x - 1
π as 4/√Φ solves for
f(x)=x4 + 16x2 - 256
thus
16=Φπ²
and General Relativity states:
e=MC²
thus must concern the herein derived:
1=Φπ²/16

The former f(x) graphed with an overlay of the same geometry:

Image

__________________________________________________________________________

Image
Image
Image

This is important because it confirms the bi-rotation model (mandated by the geometry as intrinsic)
and implies a bi-orientation compliment, the properties of which can be derived inductively -
the implications of which amounts to the capacity to calculate universal roots using universal geometries
that satisfy cubed proportionality (as time and space reciprocally do) viz. (s³/t ∞ t³/s).

Gottafly
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:18 am

Re: Unity and Phi^3

Post by Gottafly » Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:34 am

Amazing stuff. Are the final equations you discovered shown in this thread? It may be easier to follow for newbies, like me, if you could provide a brief background, and show the equations.

User avatar
user737
Posts: 171
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2018 7:39 pm
Location: In your head

Re: Unity and Phi^3

Post by user737 » Tue Jan 28, 2020 8:42 pm

It might be of interest to you to review the attached file for my thoughts on the matter.

Of note, it looks as though there is a mathematical corollary to the geometric concept of dimensional reduction/expansion with regard to phi

Φ = (1 + √5)/2
Attachments
playing_with_phi.xlsx
(14.96 KiB) Downloaded 252 times
Infinite Rider on the Big Dogma

User avatar
ckiit
Posts: 56
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 7:54 am

Re: Unity and Phi^3

Post by ckiit » Wed Jan 29, 2020 3:55 am

user737 wrote:
Tue Jan 28, 2020 8:42 pm
It might be of interest to you to review the attached file for my thoughts on the matter.

Of note, it looks as though there is a mathematical corollary to the geometric concept of dimensional reduction/expansion with regard to phi

Φ = (1 + √5)/2
Thanks, this is great: unfortunately I can not open office files on this computer, but will take a look when possible.

What are the odds of a single identity whose +/- root solutions are +1 and +phi^3, thus scale invariant?
Would that not be an equation which describes the physical universe?

User avatar
user737
Posts: 171
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2018 7:39 pm
Location: In your head

Re: Unity and Phi^3

Post by user737 » Wed Jan 29, 2020 2:46 pm

ckiit wrote:
Wed Jan 29, 2020 3:55 am
What are the odds of a single polynomial whose +/- root solutions are +1 and +phi^3, thus scale invariant?
Would that not be an equation which describes the physical universe?
3 = Φ2 + Φ = Φ2 / (Φ-1) = (Φ+1) / (Φ-1) = -Φ × Φ2= -Φ3

(1/Φ)2 + 1/Φ = +1

where Φ = (1 + √5)/2 -- the golden ratio
Infinite Rider on the Big Dogma

User avatar
ckiit
Posts: 56
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 7:54 am

Re: Unity and Phi^3

Post by ckiit » Wed Jan 29, 2020 3:05 pm

user737 wrote:
Wed Jan 29, 2020 2:46 pm
ckiit wrote:
Wed Jan 29, 2020 3:55 am
What are the odds of a single polynomial whose +/- root solutions are +1 and +phi^3, thus scale invariant?
Would that not be an equation which describes the physical universe?
Φ3 = Φ2 + Φ = Φ2 / (Φ-1) = (Φ+1) / (Φ-1) = -Φ3

(1/Φ)2 + 1/Φ = 1
But (1/Φ)2 + 1/Φ
≠ 1, 4.23606797...
must equal both simultaneously.

User avatar
user737
Posts: 171
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2018 7:39 pm
Location: In your head

Re: Unity and Phi^3

Post by user737 » Wed Jan 29, 2020 3:15 pm

ckiit wrote:
Wed Jan 29, 2020 3:05 pm
But (1/Φ)2 + 1/Φ
≠ 1, 4.23606797...
must equal both simultaneously.
Must be missing the "imaginary" root... missing the spin ("yin") component.
Rotational (π) component is not considered, only linear ("yang").

Must use quantum π or yin π.

yang/diagrammatic π = 3.14159...

yin/kinematic/quantum π = 4

One electric displacement is 8 natural units and one magnetic displacement is 4 natural units (as magnetic:electric is 2:1)

[(Φ2 + Φ)][(1/Φ)2 + (1/Φ)] = 1 + (1/Φ) + Φ + 1

2 + Φ + (1/Φ) = 4.236067977 (Φ3)

Also where Φ = +1 the result is 4 or π

Checking work...
Infinite Rider on the Big Dogma

User avatar
ckiit
Posts: 56
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 7:54 am

Re: Unity and Phi^3

Post by ckiit » Thu Jan 30, 2020 4:31 am

user737 wrote:
Wed Jan 29, 2020 3:15 pm
ckiit wrote:
Wed Jan 29, 2020 3:05 pm
But (1/Φ)2 + 1/Φ
≠ 1, 4.23606797...
must equal both simultaneously.
Must be missing the "imaginary" root... missing the spin ("yin") component.
Rotational (π) component is not considered, only linear ("yang").

Must use quantum π or yin π.

yang/diagrammatic π = 3.14159...

yin/kinematic/quantum π = 4

One electric displacement is 8 natural units and one magnetic displacement is 4 natural units (as magnetic:electric is 2:1)

[(Φ2 + Φ)][(1/Φ)2 + (1/Φ)] = 1 + (1/Φ) + Φ + 1

2 + Φ + (1/Φ) = 4.236067977 (Φ3)

Also where Φ = +1 the result is 4 or π

Checking work...
Both solutions are "sitting" on coefficient π2:
when setting to ^1 = pie
when setting ^2 = phi
they are thus joined.

User avatar
user737
Posts: 171
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2018 7:39 pm
Location: In your head

Re: Unity and Phi^3

Post by user737 » Fri Jan 31, 2020 11:50 am

Go ask Plato what he thinks about 1-1-Phi-1/Phi (as we have derived herein)
Infinite Rider on the Big Dogma

User avatar
ckiit
Posts: 56
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 7:54 am

Re: Unity and Phi^3

Post by ckiit » Fri Jan 31, 2020 12:26 pm

user737 wrote:
Wed Jan 29, 2020 3:15 pm

yin/kinematic/quantum π = 4

One electric displacement is 8 natural units and one magnetic displacement is 4 natural units (as magnetic:electric is 2:1)

[(Φ2 + Φ)][(1/Φ)2 + (1/Φ)] = 1 + (1/Φ) + Φ + 1

2 + Φ + (1/Φ) = 4.236067977 (Φ3)

Also where Φ = +1 the result is 4 or π

Checking work...
phi of 16 = 8x2
pi of 16 = 4x4

Does the value of pi modify to 4 if Φ = +1?

Post Reply