Conscious Knowledge of Ignorance (Inference) Theorem (CKIIT)

Discussion concerning other (non-RS) systems of theory and the insights obtained from them, as applied to the developing RS2 theory.
Post Reply
User avatar
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 7:54 am

Conscious Knowledge of Ignorance (Inference) Theorem (CKIIT)

Post by ckiit » Sun Dec 22, 2019 9:29 am

( progress...)

To cease-and-collapse any/all "believer vs. unbeliever" conflict(s)
as they relate to the perpetuation of any/all human suffering and death
owing to: lacking conscious knowledge of belief-based ignorance
due to the herein derived, thus hypothesized root:


as it indiscriminately relates to any/all possible theist/atheist,
secular/religious context(s) and their respective root(s).
Requires: Rejection of Aristotelian Identity Law A = A ... f=12&t=677

A ≠ A
A = *A

*variability allows all manner of motion (+)(-) indiscriminate
R/S System of Theory Postulates:
1. The physical universe is composed of one component, motion, existing in three dimensions, in discrete units and with two, reciprocal aspects, space and time.

2. The physical universe conforms to the relations of ordinary, commutative mathematics, its primary magnitudes are absolute and its geometry is Euclidean.
V = S/T → *A = S/T
Let v be any/all manner of motion(s) capturing all,
indiscriminately, in discrete units,
as related to all inquiries incl. (con)scientifically
initiated, both: potential measure, and actual measure,
relating to all relevant impetus' (along with their root(s))
and all relevant impedance(s) (including substance of belief(s))
possible (or not), probable (or not), actual (or not)
actually potent (and/or actually not),
real material bodies (and/or ethereal immaterial bodies)
along with their own gravitational (dis)placement(s)
whose constituency(s) both proposes, thus composes,
of just universally measurable unit(s) of
universal motion(s):
source-origin impetus indiscriminate
either physical and/or metaphysical,
actual and potential,
incl. both potential and actual humanistic
motive(s), will(s) and/or intent(s);
conscious (and/or unconscious),
knowing (and/or unknowing),
as so knowledgeably (and/or ignorantly) attained,
conducted: (past), present and/or future...
relevantly, (and/or irrelevantly),
rationally (and/or irrationally),
knowingly (and/or unknowingly),
known, merely in part, or absolutely (or not),
and/or otherwise absolutely believed,
(respective to each their own varying degree(s))
concerning (e)motion(s), their (dis)placement(s) and/or (dis)orientation(s),
are, at present, as present as any ever-present universal law(s) must universally permit

ever-motioning to cause, sustain and/or irrationally impede on
the cessation of any and all
human suffering(s)
are as duly universally contained in the same:
universal unit(s) of motion,
v, as: space over time, thus
v = s/t.

Requires: unifying *A, in-as v, of v = s/t → c.
Let *A be any breathing (ie. motioning) body
whose impetus/impedance is captured in-of v.

v = s/t
*A = s/t

Let c be unity over (light less boundary) as 1/1.

Unifying v into/as *A

Let *A be unified.
universal operators: (all+∞-not), and
universal roots: (causation+∞-cessation), thus
*A = √(alpha∞omega), √(beginning∞end)

Metalogical / Torulogical Geometry:
Let *A be any metaphysical motioning body with equal capacity to motion between roots and operators
Let (+A and -A) be real/ethereal universal operators: (all+∞-not) viz. (alpha∞omega)
Let (√+A and √-A) be real/ethereal universal root(s): (causation+∞-cessation) viz. (beginning∞end)

Let *A naturally (as necessitated by nature)
possess intrinsic capacity to reciprocate:
sustaining itself by way of self-sustained
*reciprocate conjugation motion(s):
*{(-)∞(+)} *A is breathing in/out {(+)∞(-)}
viz. allows for (ir)rationalization, including
*{multiplicative reciprocity}
denoted in-as *A, allowing all universal manner(s)
of relative rational (and irrational) motion(s).
'reciprocal' - any rationed identity(s) (as denoted by v)
whose variable multiplicative inverse(s),
if/when known, attained to and/or rationally operated on,
invariably reconciles to unity as 1/1.

v = s/t
thus becomes with equivalence,
*A = s/t
thus granting *A simultaneously to be +A and/or -A
+A = +s/+t (+relatively static)
-A = -(s/t), -s/t, s/-t (-relatively dynamic)

+A is (relatively static) one-dimensional time t, and
-A is (relatively dynamic) three-dimensional space s, thus
*A is simultaneously subject to/of the (e)motional aspect(s) of
space, s, and time, t.
s, as 3d space: for practical purposes of (meta)physical "orientation", and
t, as 1d time: for purposes of (meta)physical "science(s)", and
*A is relative to s/t according to its own potential/actual (-)impetuses and (+)impedance(s)

viz. Pentalogical-Quaternion metalogical proof-of-concept
definitely indefinitely approaches 'state' of 'all-knowing' such to know all
causation/cessation of any/all suffering/death.

impetus √-A = {to Know all thus: not to Believe}
**circle expanding indefinitely; metalogically -A**
(tends towards any possible all-knowing 'state'
incl. any possible relevant knowledge(s)
suffering and/or death).
impetus √+A = {to Believe all thus: not to Know}
**circle contracting indefinitely; metalogically +A **
(tends towards any possible 'state'
of belief-based ignorance(s)
suffering and/or death).
Addresses any/all suffering/death motion(s)
due to the conflict(s) associated with any/all
belief-based ideological division(s):

"us" vs. "them" elab.

by undermining:
All knowing is belief (?), but not all belief is knowing.
-Philosophy (current)
thus graduates with (and while revealing) accompanying scientific methodology :
All knowing is by way of consciously trying all belief, but
not all belief is by way of consciously trying to know all.
o. in(de)finitum... to consciously acKNOWledge all BELIEF(S)
i. to TRY both: to (alpha) and not (omega) to BELIEVE
ii. to TEST both: true and/or not (necessarily)
iii. to FALSIFY all BELIEF(s) NOT (necessarily) TRUE infinitum ...
Undermines: all "believer vs. unbeliever" conflict(s) by finding the root of suffering
as absolution-of-belief: the identity/property derived of the mythical Edenic
tree of the knowledge of good and evil, with all relevant accordance(s) to the admonishment of Genesis 2:17
satisfied, thus clarifying any/all Judaic/Christian/Islamic (amal. "Abrahamic") context(s):

ומעץ הדעת טוב ורע לא תאכל ממנו כי ביום אכלך ממנו מות תמות
And concerning the tree of the knowledge of good and evil: do not eat from it
as eating thereof in time shall certainly cause death (over death).
√+A is hypothesized as the biblical equivalent to (ie. metalogical identity of) the tree of the knowledge of good and evil:
absolution-of-belief, wherein any/all expression(s) of being(s) which is (are) absolutely bound to certainly believe anyone or anything to an absolute certainty (esp. relating to matters of so-called good and evil) wherein the substance (ie. root(s)) of the belief(s) is (are) displaced from true unity, thus containing any/all belief-based ignorance(s) whose gravity proportionally embodies the degree(s) to which the concerned has no conscious knowledge of their own belief-based ignorance(s) causing suffering/death.
√-A is thus hypothesized, by way of inference (hence the theorem to which the utility owes itself) as the reciprocate of the biblical equivalent to (ie. metalogical identity of) the tree of living (forever): to know all thus: not to believe, such to cease any/all manner of suffering/death.

ויאמר הנחש אל האשה לא מות תמתון
כי ידע אלהים כי ביום אכלכם ממנו ונפקחו עיניכם והייתם כאלהים ידעי טוב ורע
And saying the serpent 'you will certainly die not
as God doth know that in time as ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall open, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
Both are metalogically valid, as it is a matter of the root:
regarding the substance of any belief: to merely believe to absolutely know,
while knowing not not to believe such to be so, in thus being wrong,
one is thus certainly absolutely dead wrong
especially concerning knowledge of the physical and/or metaphysical "roots"
of such universal absolutes as (so-called) good and evil.
to certainly know not to do so: absolutely believe
anyone or anything to such absolute degree(s),
thus not ever eating from such a tree as (so-called) good and evil,
one is thus knowing how to consciously regard the admonishment
(concerning matters of the same) as they relate (or not) to matters of
all human suffering and death.
(in dedication to Isha)

User avatar
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 7:54 am

Re: Conscious Knowledge of Ignorance (Inference) Theorem (CKIIT)

Post by ckiit » Sat Jan 04, 2020 7:23 am


to do:
i. metalogical mapping of torulogical geometry - explanation, practical demonstration and application(s)

User avatar
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 7:54 am

Re: Conscious Knowledge of Ignorance (Inference) Theorem (CKIIT)

Post by ckiit » Sat Jan 04, 2020 3:56 pm


Posts: 45
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2017 9:44 am

Re: Conscious Knowledge of Ignorance (Inference) Theorem (CKIIT)

Post by blaine » Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:03 pm

Are you familiar with Chris Langan's work? It seems similar to your ideas, I found it pretty interesting. ... 9021-1.pdf

User avatar
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 7:54 am

Re: Conscious Knowledge of Ignorance (Inference) Theorem (CKIIT)

Post by ckiit » Tue Jan 14, 2020 4:40 pm

blaine wrote:
Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:03 pm
Are you familiar with Chris Langan's work? It seems similar to your ideas, I found it pretty interesting. ... 9021-1.pdf
Thank you for the resource - I wasn't aware of this work as I did not know who Chris Langan was.
Nevertheless, I was happy to find the following on page 10 (apologies for the distorted capture):


This null boundary is the very property CKIIT exploits:
1. (a) contains the +alpha/-omega conjugation that is intrinsic to enclosed bodies, including human beings.
(b) +180° of arc is alpha (ie. all/positive/affirmative) (0 → +1), -180° of arc is omega (ie. not/negative/denial) (0 → -1)
2. (a) and (b) can also be any symmetrical form, such as the pentagram utilized by CKIIT:


This pentalogical "progression" mapping has a vesica piscis equivalent
(satisfying the natural "progression" and "gravitation" as it relates to c and/or r2=±1)
and a toroidal equivalent whose mapping is local to any such self-enclosed body(s) to which it applies:

I am hoping someone from RSoT can pick up on this, as it has the potency to broad-spectrum
address/collapse the problem(s) associated with "belief" by identifying the signature(s) of it - inversion:


and can thus be used to solve for many/any root(s), including
of the metaphysical Edenic tree(s) of living and the inverse suffering/death,
along with the actually manifest physical counterparts thereof, such as the root(s)
of Nazism/Fascism/Socialism (however sensitive they may be).

I'm sure our projects would be perfectly compatible side-by-side, however
my approach is for humanity to have a simple solution that maps onto the body
as it serves to progressively "lift" one from belief into knowledge ad infinitum.
If in-between each step a full cycle of alpha/omega commences, the only factor
which determines the "direction" is which foot is lead with:
to know (all (thus) not) to believe, or
to believe (all (thus) not) to know
are inverted 180-degree counter-parts, thus
solves the long-standing conflict(s) of:

"believer vs. unbeliever"

as it pertains to any possible context(s): theist/atheist-invariant.

I will be launching it in the near future on its own dedicated platform,
thus in the meantime wish to subject it to others for strengths/weaknesses
as I will be platforming the RSoT along with it to replace Einstein's GToR
and his source-origin-forsaken old space-bending balls.

Post Reply