Question about the YinYang
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:17 pm
Hi, it is first time i am posting
In the images carrousel at your home page i saw one citing the Yin yang, which i didn't understand. It is supposed to be expressed in a ironic way i guess, but i didn't get the ironic point (if that was the case) either.
Nevertheless, i did a search in the forum and i found this bit:
http://www.reciprocal.systems/phpBB3/vi ... =Yin#p3157
which hits in a similar direction i am apporaching the question of reciprocity.
----------
The point i want to show is that up to 2009, there wasn't any formalization of logic for the yin-yang equilibrium-harmony process. Luckily there was one person who broke through and evolved it and is still evolving it, with amazing outcomes, imho.
Initial theory was called: Fuzzy sets in a YinYang Bipolar Dynamic Equilibrium
Some more (free and locked) new papers, with very interesting bundles to the theory can be found here:
https://works.bepress.com/wen-ran_zhang/
I have reviewed most of them and i have my own reports about them, i haven't read that deeply any of the papers of RS2.
I also have to admit that i can hardly deal with technicalities, but i can help much in replying to Penrose .
Nevertheless i wanted to link you to those in case you didn't know, and by the way ask you whether or what you consider positive from it to integrate in yours, or what are your bug reports on it?
Since it is my first post, and i have also being confused by the homepage image (it can lead me to think that you already deprecate such tool),
and i don't know which parts it could help you more my input, i refrain myself for sharing more my views on it for now.
Regards and let's keep sharing if you wish.
In the images carrousel at your home page i saw one citing the Yin yang, which i didn't understand. It is supposed to be expressed in a ironic way i guess, but i didn't get the ironic point (if that was the case) either.
Nevertheless, i did a search in the forum and i found this bit:
http://www.reciprocal.systems/phpBB3/vi ... =Yin#p3157
which hits in a similar direction i am apporaching the question of reciprocity.
----------
The point i want to show is that up to 2009, there wasn't any formalization of logic for the yin-yang equilibrium-harmony process. Luckily there was one person who broke through and evolved it and is still evolving it, with amazing outcomes, imho.
Initial theory was called: Fuzzy sets in a YinYang Bipolar Dynamic Equilibrium
Some more (free and locked) new papers, with very interesting bundles to the theory can be found here:
https://works.bepress.com/wen-ran_zhang/
I have reviewed most of them and i have my own reports about them, i haven't read that deeply any of the papers of RS2.
I also have to admit that i can hardly deal with technicalities, but i can help much in replying to Penrose .
Nevertheless i wanted to link you to those in case you didn't know, and by the way ask you whether or what you consider positive from it to integrate in yours, or what are your bug reports on it?
Since it is my first post, and i have also being confused by the homepage image (it can lead me to think that you already deprecate such tool),
and i don't know which parts it could help you more my input, i refrain myself for sharing more my views on it for now.
Regards and let's keep sharing if you wish.