Re: RS2 Tutorial Book
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 4:08 pm
What about a more mathematical term, such as "delta?"Horace wrote:Also, for me another bad thing was the choice to use the word "displacement" instead of "deviation".
Advanced research into the Reciprocal System of theory
https://reciprocal.systems/phpBB3/
What about a more mathematical term, such as "delta?"Horace wrote:Also, for me another bad thing was the choice to use the word "displacement" instead of "deviation".
So glad to hear that.It turns out that Sun's comments on dimensional splitting (1D vs 3D) became a kind of Rosetta Stone for RS2...
I am not writing this for academia... Larson tried for 40 years to get their attention and was rejected, refused and attacked. I've been selling Larson's books for 10 years now. Initially, it was not a big job--perhaps ONE book a month. Then the --daniel papers came out--totally non-academic--and in that first week, I had over 100 book orders. Now, book sales are about one a day, because of the daniel papers--which are humorous, full of Sci-Fi references and are written for non-academia. These are the people that are interested.
From what I've seen, we no longer live in an academic world. The days of the "think tank" and research institutes are gone. People send me links to "scientific achievements" all the time... and when I look at them, it usually comes down to a convoluted way to get funding... such as the LIGO nonsense with "gravity waves" from binary black holes. There is no longer any common sense in academia--it has gotten so theoretical, that they have forgotten about Nature and "natural consequence." Not to mention that academic books are boring... I know, I've read hundreds of them. People lack the patience to read technical books--of those I've sold, I'd bet only 1% have actually read the book they bought, cover-to-cover.RS is good enough to be comprehensible by college students, while conventienal science can't even explain spin-½ to a student below "professor" level. I suggest make it more academic like Larson's books.
Just mentioning RS theory will cause immediate rejection in the scientific community--that has been the case for over 50 years now. But there actually IS a big market for such research and if you get interesting results from your experiment, I can put you in touch with those people. They are desperate for experimental results and would really grab on to something like this.I'm planning doing an experiment about gypsum, extracting its pharmacological effects (anti-inflammation and antipyretic effect) by water without physical contact, which might violate the active ingredients theory, which is completely powered by RS theory. I don't want it to be rejected by the reason that "quoting a science fiction book".
Zuoqian would be the expert here, but I based the correlation of yin-yang on Chinese philosophy. I can understand the confusion. For example, heat is a time-region phenomenon and is hot, causing expansion (definitely yang), but you have to remember that it is crossing a unit boundary to do that--inversion--from the time region to the time-space region. Though the effects of thermal motion in the TSR are yang, the cause in the TR is yin. This is one of the big difficulties in trying to explain reciprocal relations--everything flips, depending on where it is observed from.Sun wrote: ↑Mon Mar 19, 2018 2:54 am Another thing is the concept of Yin and Yang. It might be a problem when extending RS theory to life science. The cosmic sector, time region, energy, is actually Yang in Chinese philosophy. All of the ancient books of China, for example 《Lao Zi》(Taoism) ,《Huangdi Neijing》(anatomy and physiology of human body) are written from a time perspective. Yang in these books is refer to motions from time region. So it may provoke confusions when making correlation between these knowledges and RS theory.
I like it a lot. Even as a technical thinker, being a computer programmer, I still have trouble keeping straight the various combinations of regions and sectors. Reading it in terms of Sci Fi immediately felt more approachable and understandable/relatable.