SoverT wrote: ↑Mon Mar 20, 2017 4:56 pm
This is something I immediately ran into when trying to think of motion as a pressure system. It's not a simple scalar , it's a scalar with a bunch of other rules, like occasional dimensional reduction, locked dimensions, dual projective geometries which somehow restrict scalar magnitudes in a non-projective realm, etc. All sorts of shenanigans complicating things.
Larson's "time region" confuses a lot of people, because he separates it out from conventional space-time by making it "time only." That is actually NOT the case, because you cannot have
motion without TWO aspects.
Inside the time region, the "space" aspect is fixed at unity--but it is STILL THERE, so it isn't 1/t, it is 1s/nt. And Larson had to do this because he was a "linear" thinker. BUT, when you add the yin/angular component back in, what you find is that the "time region" is actually the "yin region," where motion is an angular velocity. All rotational structures within the time region are therefore connected to the SAME location in space, because rotation always loops back to where it started (linear doesn't). However, that only applies to primary motion--composites, like birotation, can produce linear-like structures
within the time region, such a thermal motion does.
Basically, the "time region" is just a yin/angular expression of the cosmic sector. In the Cosmic, you have linear, 3D time relationships that spread out across the universe. In the time region, you have angular, 3D time relationships, that are stuck at one location.
Thinking of it that way, any structure within the time region would have to be
polar (whereas the cosmic would be
rectangular). Polar structures are typically polyhedra, such as described by Dr. Robert Moon's research on "Sacred Solids in the Atomic Nucleus." This probably give rise to the "shell" concept of atoms, because it is the only way you have structure surrounding the same, central location.
Now if you add secondary motions that create "linear time" displacements in the time region (called "shift" in projective geometry), the internal structure starts to resemble a
molecule--something we see on the outside of the time region. "As above, so below," so it may be that the internal structure is much like external, molecular structure, similar in nature to John Keely's "etheron" -- the particles that make up an atom, which is where conventional science gets "quarks" from.
I think Mathis intuited this with his stacking of CDs. He is still thinking in linear terms, but is basically building polyhedra with them. I still have to investigate it, but I suspect by using polar geometry, the rules to construct the polyhedra may become obvious.
SoverT wrote: ↑Mon Mar 20, 2017 4:56 pm
Relating it back to the computer simulations, Bruce, I'm still curious to see what your code model looks like, as I've not been able to even figure out data structures yet.
The structures I use are documented in the
RS2-109 paper, Dimensional Thinking.
The Java code I am using is on GitHub:
ReciprocalSystem/systems.reciprocal
Look in the src/systems/reciprocal/model folder for the data structures to model particles and atoms. I have not updated it in a while, as I've been busy with other things. Of course, with this new info, I may have to do a rewrite!
Every dogma has its day...