bperet wrote:
I thought it'd be the other way around. If you had one perspective, then they'd appear the same. The dualistic perspective is what creates the dichotomy, right?Space and time are the same thing--from TWO different perspectives. When you have ONE perspective, as in the case of an observer, they appear different.
bperet wrote:
The reference frame is also the dichotomy, that is, it is also the perspective. There is no "perspective of a reference frame" unless there is more than one reference frame. Of course, defining two reference frames requires yet another reference frame.Just a question of where you put the dichotomy--on the reference frame, or the objects in the reference frame.
bperet wrote:
This is the "nondual" cognition. But the "realms" are created by the perspectives. In other words "realms" don't only exist to be perceived or discovered by our perception, as "an eye in each realm" would suggest, because the eye and the realm are not independent concepts. That is, unless you were to define multiple reference frames.With two, concurrent perspectives--an eye in each realm--both will appear Euclidean, but then you may have difficulty correlating the motions with each other, since space and time would be the same thing and your consciousness could not distinguish them from one another.