Reciprocal System Research Society

Another strange coincidence...

h-bar * c = 3.161526205E-026

sqrt 10 = 3.16227766

3.16227766 / 3.161526205E-026 = 1.000237687E+026

davelook wrote:

h-bar * c = 3.161526205E-026

sqrt 10 = 3.16227766

What is the significance?

Larson NORMAL charge mass .00004494 = 7.46027E-32 kg. (O-16 scale value)

charge mass (kg) X c = 2.2365328545E-23

sqrt 5 = 2.236067977

2.2365328545E-23 / 2.236067977 = 1.000207899

The significance of these numbers reveals what I can only describe as of yet as the natural counting system's fractal value nature of charge.

Or, this might be nature's way of saying 1 = 1^2 = 1^3.

For some strange reason, as proved by harmonics and sacred math, nature has a way of ignoring powers of ten. This is what the science of fractals is all about.

I'm working thru what these coincidences signify, but in the meantime I think they should be out there for others to ponder.

I am ultimately working toward a numerical understanding of the RATIO between the circumference as 4.55633 (Snat) and the Bohr circumference, which is the 137.036 (fine structure constant).

This number has been experimentally determined with absurd accuracy, and I'd like to find it's value using RS theory.

New method of measuring the G brings value much closer to Larson's calculation method...

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/a ... REPORTS%5D

1/c^3 divided by 1.66053873E-027 (amu constant) = 22.35058433, times 3 = 67.05175299

New value is 6.693 X 10^-11

67.05175299/6.693 = 1.00182

(decimal point misplaced depending on the units you use to measure c and G)

But I have another question; why is 22.3505843 so darn close to sqrt5, 2.23607?

2.23607/22.3505843= 0.1000451687 ...this is not a coincidence, somewhere the mass measure is tied to the c measure.

davelook wrote:

But I have another question; why is 22.3505843 so darn close to sqrt5, 2.23607?

The sqrt(5) is the basis for the golden ratio, which shows up frequently when working with the coupling between the spatial and counterspatial reference frames, particularly in the biological realm. Dan loaned me some books on plants, showing the geometry of growth patterns being related by the phi ratio. Things like buds and leaf patterns can be calculated by creating linkage between space and counterspace, and plotted out with remarkable detail.

It may have something to do with the 'wavicle' (a discrete unit of counterspace) coupling to a 'particle'.

Just need to remember that we are dealing with the coordinate reference system in these cases, not the scalar motion, so the observer principle has to be accounted for.

davelook wrote:

2.23607/22.3505843= 0.1000451687 ...this is not a coincidence, somewhere the mass measure is tied to the c measure.

No doubting that; E = mc² or sqrt(E/m) = c

One of the things I am considering more and more is that we cannot "see" mass, because mass has the dimensions of energy (t³/s³). What we visually perceive is 'gravity' (s³/t³)--a speed. All the other t/s relations are distributed scalar motions (invisible force fields), so why would mass be an exception?

Another strange coincidence...

h-bar * c = 3.161526205E-026

sqrt 10 = 3.16227766

3.16227766 / 3.161526205E-026 = 1.000237687E+026

.....I thought I was really onto something new with my coincidences, but it's all covered in something called "Observer Physics"...

http://www.dpedtech.com/observer%20physics.htm

Here's another one I just discovered...

(ec)/((sqrt10)/3))=4.5567196698E-011

4.5567196698E-011 / 4.5563352528E-008 = 1.0000843698E-03

MAN have I got a good one for you today!!!!!!!!

Go to this page http://id.mind.net/~zona/mmts/miscellan ... olver.html and enter the following values:

a=1, b=-64.0625, c=-1, hit calculate. (64.0625 is just (128+1/8)/2, the fine structure constant converges to 128 at high energies.)

Then add a zero to c=-1, so it equals -10, and hit calculate. Keep adding zeros to c= until you hit the jackpot at c=-10000!

Key to this discovery was the sudden realization that 137.0359... PLUS 72.97352... = 200+10. Then I found that 137.0359... MINUS 72.97352... = 64.06247432 (close to 128.125/2).

There are 2 other dimensionless ratios which scale like this.

Water boil/freeze on absolute temp scale 373.15/273.15 = 1.3660992 (pure dimensionless energy ratio)

c/2Rinf = 13.6595 (this is a PURE NUMBER 1/t) Also, remember that 1/13.6595 = 0.0732089 (sqrt3-1)/10

1.3661 is a very interesting number because if you make it the adj. side, and the hypotenuse is sqrt2, the opp will be .3661, but the sides are based on the sqrt3. After you square the sides, look how they add up. That's what made a light bulb go off in my head about alpha.

Also, the thermal conductance quantum, when you use T = 273.15 K, gives 1613544223 W/K (1/t), so the thermal resistance is 6.197536986E-10 K/W, (t/1). Divide THAT by Space to get energy, and you get 0.01360202146. Divide that by .02353827 (freezing point of water in eV), and you get 1/sqrt3.

And most of all, let's not forget that electron spin, the PRIMARY source of all "quantum phenomena" according to David Hestenes (see pg 51 of http://modelingnts.la.asu.edu/pdf/SpacetimePhysics.pdf is quantized in units of sqrt3/2 h-bar.

JUST FOUND THIS on http://www.dac.neu.edu/physics/a.cromer ... ssure.html...

Quote:

Let Vi be the volume of a gas at the temperature of an ice-water mixture (Oo C) and let Vb be the volume of this same gas at the temperature of boiling water (100o C). Then, assuming no change in pressure, the ratio of these volumes is found to be the same for all gases:

Vb/Vi= 1.3661 . . . (3)

AND Get this on http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/standards/am0/newam0.html...

Quote:

The integrated spectral irradiance has been made to conform to the value of the solar constant accepted by the space community; which is 1366.1 W/m2.

davelook wrote:

c/2Rinf = 13.6595 (this is a PURE NUMBER 1/t) Also, remember that 1/13.6595 = 0.0732089 (sqrt3-1)/10

Sorry, 13.6595 is actually dimensionful, s^2/t.

Ok, this is probably nothing, but I'll get it out there...

2*3*5*7=210 (/2=105)

1/105= 0.0095238095238.... (+210) = 210.0095238095...

Using the newest (2006, Gabrielse) experimental value for alpha (137.03599971096) plus it's reciprocal (x10^4) 72.97352535897, you get

210.00952507

/ 210.0095238095... = 1.000000006001678