Discussion concerning the first major re-evaluation of Dewey B. Larson's Reciprocal System of theory, updated to include counterspace (Etheric spaces), projective geometry, and the non-local aspects of time/space.
I think the overall outline is more an overview--of which the details must be fleshed out in discussion. And your comments need to be discussed so we can fully understand the range, boundaries and structures of the theory.
To add to your issue, I perceive motion, space and time as only something projected by the rational mind and its perception is mostly limited to a physical universe. Perhaps the language is different but vibration and energy could be similar manifestations that is perceived as motion. What is the fundamental underpinning? I am sure there are several levels of understanding each of us must sort through.
I am attempting to see if this "system" accommodates more than just physical, mental-rational linear and scientific reality--that known only to human sensing or mathematical computation.
That can only be revealed in discussions, and the outline help guide and ground the discussion. I don't see the overview as a concrete document but a changing, fluid, flexible roadmap that help each of us (and the group) through the discussion process.
Rick
Quote:
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Phillip"
I read completely through your original email. Then I started my reply.
My comments added at ***
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:56:18 -0800 bperet)> writes: : Here are my notes/slides on the basic questions of space, time and motion...
Reciprocally Integrated Systems Theory
“You’re on your own when you violate the laws of physics—and don’t take notes.”
—John Hutchinson
The Hutchinson Anti-Gravity Effect
Basic Questions
What is space ?
What is time ?
How do space and time interact?
*** What is motion?
Is what I see the same as what you see?
*** Is what I feel the same as what you feel?
What assumptions do we have when we view/***feel everything about us?
What have we been trained to see, versus what is actually there?
*** What have we been trained to feel, versus what is "actually there"? ("Actually there" is space based and so is not properly accurate.
Space
Space is normally understood as a volume:
“It takes up too much space.”
“I need more space!” (*** a distance with or without a radius)
“Is there enough space in the fridge for this pie?”
*** Space can also be understood as a distance or area
*** Interestingly enough the first defination of space, the noun, is "a period of time"
Space also refers to “void”, as in outer space, or a wide open space.
Space as Volume
Volumetric space has 3 dimensions: width, height and depth.
*** or radius and two rotations as Larson did.
It can be what IS contained (water jug), or what is NOT (outer space).
Volumes have a finite amount of “stuff” in them, like 4 cubic feet of dirt.
The amount of “stuff” is a constant magnitude associated with the volume.