Constant coincidences

Discussion concerning the first major re-evaluation of Dewey B. Larson's Reciprocal System of theory, updated to include counterspace (Etheric spaces), projective geometry, and the non-local aspects of time/space.
davelook
Posts: 85
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:50 pm

Constant coincidences

Post by davelook »

Using the Rydberg freq, 3.289842E+015=1/(2pi*sqrt(L*C)), and standard Larson units for the capacitance s3/t=6.223748666E-007, you get an L value of 0.011175591067 (t3/s3). So the cube root is .22357513446(t/s), and s/t = 4.4727693105...

sqrt(5)*2=4.472135955 /4.4727693105 = 1.00014!

Also, take a look at this from NBM, Ch. 13...

Quote:
Thus, in order to arrive at the values of the natural units in terms of the cgs system of measurement, each of the values given for the energy group in the first column of the tabulation must be divided by this factor: 2.236055×10-8.
...or multiplied by this factor: 4.4721619 X 107, (- the exponent being the same one they stick into the vac. permeability constant, (4pi X 107)

So coming at this number from a completely new direction from Larson is very encouraging!

By the way, look how close that early Larson value is to the sqrt(5)=2.2360679775/2.236055=1.0000058037!!!!

My first post above makes more sense now!
davelook
Posts: 85
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:50 pm

Constant coincidences

Post by davelook »

Check out this simple elegant way of generating alpha...

http://www.chip-architect.com/news/2004 ... stant.html
User avatar
bperet
Posts: 1501
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 1:43 am
Location: 7.5.3.84.70.24.606
Contact:

Planar separation of axes

Post by bperet »

Hey Dave...

I was working on some graphics regarding the Plane at Infinity and happen to notice that when the 3 orthogonal axes, X, Y and Z are projected onto the Plane at Infinity (or the Plane at Zero), they make points--one point for each axis, and one can draw a circle through those 3 points, where each point is separated by an arc 120° or 2π/3 radians--which look exactly like the 3rd roots of Unity that you have mentioned before, separating masses. Only difference being that the 3rd roots of unity would require a 3-axis projection with ONE real and TWO imaginary axes.

Could be that the masses are just the same motion, oriented on different coordinate time axes.
Every dogma has its day...
davelook
Posts: 85
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:50 pm

Tau vs coupling vs c^3

Post by davelook »

The square root of 1/alpha is considered the true "coupling constant"...

Quote by Feynman...

There is a most profound and beautiful question associated with the observed coupling constant e the amplitude for a real electron to emit or absorb a real photon. It is a simple number that has been experimentally determined to be close to -0.08542455.

By the lepton unity scale, the tau mass should be 3.1677344679E-027. The tau is a "full" unit of mass for the charged lepton scale.

So tau/c3 = .0853514 , and the latest experimental value of the coupling is .085424543.

Coincidence?
Post Reply