*by Ian Beardsley*

Original research: https://www.academia.edu/s/bdd6902242

**RELATED LINKS**

At The Earth's Core: The Geophysics of Planetary Evolution:

https://reciprocalsystem.org/paper/at-t ... -evolution

Unity and Phi^3:

https://reciprocal.systems/phpBB3/viewt ... 0&start=30

How do impossible squares relate to RST:

https://reciprocal.systems/phpBB3/viewt ... 7&start=40

So much synchronicity. I am about ¾ through the paper and can already tell the author what’s going on.

Gravity is logarithmic… specifically natural-logirthmic (w.r.t. base e).

Base e is unity datum, as I discuss here (Tao of Motion as 1=Φπ²/16), and is not correct as defined as it assumes a 0-base datum.

Inside planets are moving in 3D-coordinate time; outside planets in 3D-corrdinate space. The asteroid belt is the unit boundary (or the Sun’s gravitational limit).

Link between Space & Counterspace is Logarithmic:

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=685&p=4284#p4284

Wonderful that it makes use of Phi (Φ) and its conjugate (φ) - as defined here: Natural Numbers as Space-Time/Time-Space Conjugates).

Here (Vesica Pisces as One, Phi, Phi^2, 2*Phi, Phi^3) are the as-found relationships between √2, √3, √5, and Phi (Φ)

The author has found the same as I in that…

Quantum e is 2; Phi is 1 in Counterspace:

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=762&p=4322#p4322

The “Weird Calculus” is because Calculus is wrong…

Re: Interatomic Distance:

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=234&p=3914#p3914

“Integral of 1/x dx to be ln(x) + C is a lie as we know.

That would imply that inter-atomic distance is indeed not logarithmic.

The question then becomes how precisely do you integrate without the dreaded infinity.

This further implies we are dealing with counterspace.”

This is all terribly interesting. I shall continue and report back shortly.

user737