Building the table of elements
Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:57 am
I have not had much luck deciphering the remainder of Mathis' "Nuclear" paper, concerning the bonding of alpha particles and protons in the manner of "stacking CDs". He stops following the idea of "natural consequence" and jumps to "convenient arrangement" to explain the anomalies in the Periodic Table (such as tin, with it's 10 stable isotopes). He seems to be arranging his structures to fit the observed data, rather than deducing the structure from consequences of his theory.
But the idea that there IS a geometry to the rotations inside the time region does make sense, rather than just a compounding of rotational speeds. I have run across this concept before, where it was theorized that the protons arranged themselves along the lines of Platonic solids.
If the time region does have structure, than that interior geometry would be reflected in the exterior space, through equivalent space. Looking around, I find it might be metallic and crystalline bonding systems.
Looking at bonding, in general, I find that:
But the idea that there IS a geometry to the rotations inside the time region does make sense, rather than just a compounding of rotational speeds. I have run across this concept before, where it was theorized that the protons arranged themselves along the lines of Platonic solids.
If the time region does have structure, than that interior geometry would be reflected in the exterior space, through equivalent space. Looking around, I find it might be metallic and crystalline bonding systems.
Looking at bonding, in general, I find that:
- Covalent = geometric; bonds created by orientation of atoms.
- Ionic = scalar; bonds created by the net, scalar motion of atoms.
- Van der Waals = gravitational attraction.