Reciprocal System Research Society

<t>(Edited comment to see if I can make paragraphs --bruce.)<br/> <br/> Sorry about the lack of paragraphs. Much as I try, hitting return and all, I can't get paragraphs out. What am I doing wrong. I think the the postulate of the unit datum is wrong. Obviously it came about from Einsteins postulate...

<t>I will attempt to show how the continuous is born of the discrete. I noticed that the golden ratio produces the beautiful phi spirals we see everywhere in nature. In the examining the Golden Rectangle that generates the spiral I got to thinking how a linear structure such as the rectangle could p...

I refer you to Miles Mathis in his paper # 164, Unifying the Photon with other Quanta. "This would mean that c is the AVERAGE (my emphasis) speed not the maximum speed."

<t>Yes Bruce, I agree. But it also contracts. At this time in our universe space is expanding. We must be mindful of macro and micro cycles. For the universe as a whole, the cycle may be on the order of billions of years; for the atom, on the order of nano seconds, for lack of a more precise number....

<t>If you understand what I'm getting at then we can discuss further what I think Larson has really discovered. He is actually describing the SOURCE of motion, not motion itself. He even called it by its name, UNITY. He was pointing to the fulcrum itself, which is motionless but without which there ...

Disregard

<t>Essentially what I'm saying is that one can look at space as a cube with a sphere inside where the sides of the cube are tangential to the cube. The sphere is curved time and the cube is rectilinear space. They share a center; the cube can expand and contract; the sphere can coordintely rotate an...

<t>Obviously my comments require additional explanations. First, 4 d space is not an ad hoc assumption, it is a deduction. The postulates of projective geometry used in RS2 require a toriodal topological universe, a deduction. Inverse relationships abound in nature. Larson's very own theory is based...

<t>If s/t = Unity, would that not mean that E = m * (s/t)^n where n can be any integer? One to any power is one, but, then this could not be. Can you see my confusion? Maybe I am overlooking something. The unity datum is troubling for me because I have concluded that space must be 4 dimensional. An ...

<t>I agree with most of that but Im still iffy on the unity datum. Please see my idea under vibration and rotation for the model of a photon and see what you think. I am of the belief that if we take our cues from the close observation of nature we are more likely to be on firmer ground. Thst is why...