Reciprocal System Research Society

<t>So if t/s = t^3/s^3 * (s/t)^2 and s/t=Unity, then the equation is 1 = 1^3 * 1^2 since t/s must also be equal to Unity. So everything identifies with unity? I'm now really confused. Where am I going wrong? Is not t/s also Unity. If space is expanding, then entropy is increasing, mass is decreasing...

<t>Can you clear up something for me about the above relationships. According to Larson, energy is t/s and according to E = mc^2, energy is inversely related to time. Is Larson at odds with Einstein's equation or am I just misunderstanding? He is in agreement Einstein's equation with respect to mass...

<t>Hi All. I would like to present an idea to model the photon that allows for birotation, vibration and rotation. The toriod I think fits. Imagine a little dirt devil, a vortex,if you will. There is outward and inward rotation. The structure expands and contracts (vibration) and it can accommodate ...

<t>Mathis is pretty much correct. He is also correct in saying that this problem of finding the slope of the natural log of x is going to be protracted. You see, Leibniz did cover up a very inconvenient truth and colluded with Newton to pull it off. The integral of 1/x dx, using the chain rule, solv...

<t>I can see that we must first agree on the fundamental postulates before a a meaningful discussion can be had. Motion must be sensible. Anything that is in stillness cannot be sensed by our bodies. Rhythmic balanced interchange is how nature expresses phenomena. Motion is initiated from an imbalan...

<t>You are correct. This Cat is brilliant, and stealthy, so read with great care and discernment. I also am bedazzled by his thinking but I might just point out a couple of things. From my understanding, Larson felt the SR was correct in its math , yet off in its conceptions.. Mathis is just the opp...

<t>I have just read Mathis's paper on the ether and I must keep pressing on with the time issue. Mathis states that light is primal, not just as a motion, but in creating an absolute system of time and space by virtue of its constancy. It moves in relation to a background which is at rest and one wh...

<t>Sorry Bruce, I must respectfully disagree on this one. Your scalar space motion I take as the inspiratory half of the breathing universe. Space must contract as the universe must eventually expire. Time, on the other hand, moves inexorably forward (in a spiral fashion, I believe). Space cannot fl...

<t>The absolute of time is eternity. We perceive time by analysis and space by synthesis. Time is a succession of instants, while space is a system of associated points. The real difficulty we have on the material level is due to the fact that, while material bodies exist in space, space also exists...

<t>Hi Bruce.<br/> <br/> Lots of new terms to redefine for the uninitiated.<br/> Invisible grid... an assocition of related points? I can imagine a cubic, hyperbolic space (hypercube) expanding from its center as a tesseract that grows as cubes uniformly grow from that center. Is this what you mean? ...