Search found 252 matches

by Horace
Sun Oct 21, 2018 2:52 pm
Forum: RS2-0: Getting Started with the Reciprocal System
Topic: Orbits
Replies: 7
Views: 30955

Re: Orbits

bperet wrote: Sun Oct 21, 2018 12:38 pm Also understand that the "law of gravitation" is wrong... F = Gm1m2/r2. It is actually a logarithmic relation.
Yes and this force still gets weaker with distance, just like a string of used chewing gum gets weaker, the more it is stretched.
by Horace
Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:47 pm
Forum: RS2-0: Getting Started with the Reciprocal System
Topic: Orbits
Replies: 7
Views: 30955

Re: Orbits

So in RST the radius of the orbit is the result of a stable equilibrium and in the LST the radius of orbit is the result of an unstable equilibrium, because it relies only on gravity and inertia/centrifugal force ...and gravity weakens with distance ( it does not act as a stretched spring - it acts ...
by Horace
Sat Oct 20, 2018 2:47 pm
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Meeting a Terrific Challenge
Replies: 113
Views: 651210

Re: Meeting a Terrific Challenge

I need to intervene here and point out that Bundy's System of theory (BS theory) has little to do with Larson's Reciprocal System of theory (RS theory). I think the "LRC Research" section has this big sign "Beware all, ye enter here". I certainly am aware what I am getting into ...
by Horace
Thu Oct 18, 2018 5:10 pm
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Meeting a Terrific Challenge
Replies: 113
Views: 651210

Re: Meeting a Terrific Challenge

-1Δs, +1Δt +1Δs, +1Δt would constitute one cycle of a scalar oscillation, which I call a unit of scalar motion (space unit displacement ratio - SUDR, because it is an oscillating unit of motion, in which the space aspect is oscillating). The main issue with that definition is that the "directi...
by Horace
Thu Oct 18, 2018 3:27 pm
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Meeting a Terrific Challenge
Replies: 113
Views: 651210

Re: Meeting a Terrific Challenge

The easiest way I've found to think about it is to plot it, as what I call a world line chart. ... A continuous "direction" reversal in the space aspect, where the space/time ratio equals 1/2, is shown by the alternating green arrows zig-zagging upwards, as time progresses uniformly. For ...
by Horace
Thu Oct 18, 2018 10:32 am
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Meeting a Terrific Challenge
Replies: 113
Views: 651210

Re: Meeting a Terrific Challenge

When you speak of "A 'direction' of a unit of scalar motion," the only way the phrase makes sense in my theory, is the "direction" relative to unit speed, s/t = 1/1. At s/t = 1/2, the "direction" is one unit to the low speed side. At s/t = 2/1. the "direction"...
by Horace
Wed Oct 17, 2018 4:19 pm
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Meeting a Terrific Challenge
Replies: 113
Views: 651210

Re: Meeting a Terrific Challenge

Q1: One dimension - two "directions." I don't name them. Using the word "direction" in the context of both Q1 and Q2 is confusing to your readers at best. Could you come up with a way to differentiate these two concepts without the need to write out the full phrases, like e.g.: ...
by Horace
Tue Oct 16, 2018 5:22 pm
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Meeting a Terrific Challenge
Replies: 113
Views: 651210

Re: Meeting a Terrific Challenge

The reason I put the word "direction" in quotes is to distinguish it from the word direction, as normally thought of in a fixed reference system. For the sake of others participating in this thread, first let's clarify your vernacular used during the consideration of only one dimension of...
by Horace
Sun Oct 14, 2018 11:47 am
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Meeting a Terrific Challenge
Replies: 113
Views: 651210

Re: Meeting a Terrific Challenge

...there are no more than three non-zero dimensions in the universe of motion, and each dimension has two "directions." The fact that scalar motion is an increase or decrease of quantity, or magnitude, in the "directions" of these three dimensions, is critical to understand. IMO...
by Horace
Tue Sep 11, 2018 2:23 pm
Forum: Electricity and Electronics
Topic: Resistance, Reactance, Permeability and Permittivity
Replies: 10
Views: 46402

Re: Conversion of Natural units to Ohms

bperet wrote: Sun Sep 09, 2018 10:44 am I've been working on this for a while, but cannot seem to get any results that make sense. Hoping that someone with better math skills than I could take a stab at doing this. Thanks.
I believe that the attached paper will put you on track to cracking this ( especially the Annex )