Search found 252 matches

by Horace
Fri May 14, 2021 1:36 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Color Polarity
Replies: 1
Views: 18372

Re: Color Polarity

It is more useful than other posts related to esoterica and numerology.
by Horace
Wed Sep 16, 2020 9:55 am
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Discussions on Scalar Motion Fundamentals
Replies: 29
Views: 131778

Re: Discussions on Scalar Motion Fundamentals

@Doug Did you disengage ? Yes. Unfortunately, I'm dealing with some personal issues that are too distracting to permit me to engage in something as esoteric as this discussion. I just can't get up the energy to decipher the language being used, let alone the logic. It's been over 9 months since you...
by Horace
Mon Jun 01, 2020 2:59 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Best competition of RST
Replies: 13
Views: 59031

Best competition of RST

I always keep my eye out on other TOEs out there. In my opinion, a system that is worth looking into, must have space and time as its emergent properties. Miles Mathis does a good job at the high-level of abstraction but his thinking is too rigid on the low-level of details (e.g. what is spinning). ...
by Horace
Mon May 04, 2020 4:09 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: How do impossible squares relate to RST
Replies: 40
Views: 224256

Re: How do impossible squares relate to RST

Those are topics of his ideas, not mine, and I tried to get into them, but failed, and then personal circumstances prevented me from getting into it again. However, that was fairly recently, and it has to do with units of motion, which I do want to address, if people want to know, but I can't under...
by Horace
Mon May 04, 2020 4:03 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: How do impossible squares relate to RST
Replies: 40
Views: 224256

Re: How do impossible squares relate to RST

Djchrismac wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2020 5:43 pm A lot of my questions are the same ones that Horace has put forward to you in muliple topics and posts that you have never got round to resolving, or providing a satisfactory answer to.
Oh, someone noticed
by Horace
Mon May 04, 2020 9:23 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: How do impossible squares relate to RST
Replies: 40
Views: 224256

Re: How do impossible squares relate to RST

Hence, rotational motion cannot be scalar, since it has direction. This includes bi-rotation, as iconoclastic as this might be. Personally speaking, I fundamentally abhor this statement and would respond you're stuck in strictly linear -thinking-land a la Larson. This statement is also fundamentall...
by Horace
Sun May 03, 2020 7:15 pm
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Discussions on Scalar Motion Fundamentals
Replies: 29
Views: 131778

Re: Discussions on Scalar Motion Fundamentals

Does this make sense so far? No, because the directions* that you have plotted on this diagram are relative to its white background. I have been trying to direct your attention to this error for years. This "white canvas" of your "World Line Charts" does not exist for us (denize...
by Horace
Sun May 03, 2020 7:01 pm
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Discussions on Scalar Motion Fundamentals
Replies: 29
Views: 131778

Re: Discussions on Scalar Motion Fundamentals

dbundy wrote: Tue Apr 28, 2020 6:08 pm
Djchrismac wrote:What initiates periodic reversals in one or the other aspects of the uniform progression?
No one knows. ...
I do

Image

We've been through this already here and here.
by Horace
Sat Apr 04, 2020 11:58 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: How do impossible squares relate to RST
Replies: 40
Views: 224256

How do impossible squares relate to RST

How do impossible squares relate to RST ?
https://youtu.be/xyVl-tcB8pI
by Horace
Sat Jan 11, 2020 12:44 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Self-referential units of motion
Replies: 5
Views: 25140

Re: Self-referential units of motion

However, suppose a UofM can be self-referential if/when given a fixed vector length that is intrinsic to the UofM itself. hat such a universal pole(s) does metaphysically exist, orientation to which can cease suffering (and perhaps death). Hello, I will selectively reply to your post, because I do ...