Reciprocal System Research Society

Are you still thinking? ...or have you not recognized the lapse in your logic and summarily decided that my objections do not make sense and don't deserve a reply?

To Admin, This forum / website is barely functional. Its response time is measured in minutes and often there are several hours long outages when the server does not respond at all. Apparently, the server hosting this site (ec2-3-83-172-199.compute-1.amazonaws.com located in Ashburn,Virginia, USA) i...

The Ampere's Force Law F/L = 2k A ⋅i 1 i 2 /d can be algebraically transformed to i 1 i 2 = Fd/(2k A ⋅L) This is of no help either because it involves the dimensioned constant k A = µ 0 /4π. Within its SI dimensions [MST -2 I -2 ] , the µ 0 constant contains the Ampere -2 which cancels out the curre...

From whence does the current come? Counterspace . And there it shall return, the poles of which form a counter-space infinity (CSI)...the number of poles depending on the type of current: DC, AC, Impulse, or Oscillating. Please elaborate more about these poles and their consequences. Unlike in thes...

Force is energy normalized to a single unit of clock space (1/s), whereas acceleration is speed normalized to a single unit of clock time (1/t). Energy (inverse speed) has units t/s, ergo force is t/s /s or t/s 2 . This makes sense as force and acceleration are conjugates: F = ma → m = F/a A normie...

P = I 2 ×m/t → P×t = I 2 ×m → E = mc 2 I agree with that, but how to prove that m=Rt to a normie ? The product isomorphism of E=½mv 2 and E=½Li 2 and E=Rti 2 doesn't cut it. I have a a classical proof that mass dimensions are (t 3 /s 3 ) but proving that m=Rt outside of RST framework eludes me.

Gopi, user737 The goal is to prove that electric current has dimensions [S/T] to a normie who does not understand RST yet but understands dimensional analysis and math well. In Larson's books I found only two thin mathematical arguments for the dimensions of current being S/T (speed): The isomorphis...

It is more useful than other posts related to esoterica and numerology.

@Doug Did you disengage ? Yes. Unfortunately, I'm dealing with some personal issues that are too distracting to permit me to engage in something as esoteric as this discussion. I just can't get up the energy to decipher the language being used, let alone the logic. It's been over 9 months since you...

I always keep my eye out on other TOEs out there. In my opinion, a system that is worth looking into, must have space and time as its emergent properties. Miles Mathis does a good job at the high-level of abstraction but his thinking is too rigid on the low-level of details (e.g. what is spinning). ...