Reciprocal System Research Society

polakie11 wrote: if there is one axis/vertex there is a unified structure for rotation. The "farthest" geometric condition of two axes would be perpendicularity - that 90 degree shift would produce a cubic intersection that would not be an "inverse" but shows up in the spiral pa...

Quote: Does anyone think that it is being used intentionally, in the politcal area for example, to manage (control) the population? It is knowledge. It's application is what can constitute "abuse", not the system itself. But understand that service-to-self will do what service-to-self does...

<t>Nehru,<br/> <br/> I am unclear on exactly what an "outpouring" is. Based on your context, it appears to be a specific type of motion ("pouring" does indicate movement), or perhaps a compound motion?<br/> <br/> Are we still defining "motion" as a relationship between space and time, or is an "outp...

<t>Hi Nehru,<br/> <br/> > Attached please find a GIF image of a compound<br/> <br/> > epicyclic train, with G1, G2, G3 and G4 as independent<br/> <br/> > inputs and the Arm for output.<br/> <br/> Interesting... it looks very good. Two double-rotating systems, the common "electric" displacement as a ...

Hi Nehru,

See attached file.

Bruce

<r>> Also can you please explore if any 'electronic energy<br/> <br/> > levels' are listed in the link:<br/> <br/> > <URL url="http://www.britannica.com/eb/article?eu=119270">http://www.britannica.com/eb/article?eu=119270</URL><br/> <br/> That's a "pay site", and I'm not a member. They want $60 a ye...

<t>Hi Nehru,<br/> <br/> I'll get to work on converting it. I see you already posted some of it. Do you have access to a tool such as Microsoft FrontPage, or an HTML editor? Many people don't have Microsoft Word, and Word documents do not convert well to HTML for web pages. It would be easier if you ...

Dear Nehru,

Please see attached.

Bruce

<t>Hi Nehru,<br/> <br/> I believe I found the problem with my simulation, and I'm starting to get some interesting results. Here is a summary of what I derive from the model:<br/> <br/> 1) There doesn't seem to be a need for a "material electron". The rotational motion that works best as an "electro...

<t>Hi Nehru,<br/> <br/> I've been going over your "Particle in a Box" series, and reading the links provided. I will say that the math and concepts are still a little bit over my head, but I'm catching on (I think!).<br/> <br/> I have a question for you: what level of "confidence" to you have in the...