Reciprocal System Research Society

In the post above, we see that the magnitudes, dimensions and "directions" (polarities), of numbers, reflected in the tetraktys, allow us to map discrete units of scalar motion, as developed logically in the LRC's RSt, and identify these scalar motion combinations with the first generation...

What happened, when Hamilton invented the quaternions, is hard to overestimate. He didn't like imaginary numbers, because they weren't intuitive, but he didn't know there was any other choice, and maybe there wasn't, when dealing with calculating locations on a sphere. His algebraic couples worked w...

Is assuming a universe of nothing but motion a radical departure from the Newtonian system of physical theory? Is it ever, but who could have known back in the hey day of quantum mechanics and quantum field theory that the particle zoo of the experimentalists would finally be organized by what would...

Determined to develop a physical theory under the new system, or an RST-based RSt, which could be understood in terms of a closed form equation, I had a lot to learn. However, I don't intend to retrace all the steps and deadends that I churned my way through, during the process, but rather to explai...

Preface - Part 2 Struggling to deal with the theroretical problems of Larson's work without him, most of the active ISUS members looked to Professor K.V.K. Nehru, whose credentials and competence in science and prominence in ISUS made him the defacto heir apparent to Mr. Larson, in the eyes of many...

Preface - Part 1 The Reciprocal System based physical theory (RSt) that is being developed at the Dewey B. Larson Memorial Research Center (LRC) begins with the fundamental postulates of Larson's new system of theory, which posit a universe of motion, rather than a universe of matter; That is to sa...

With the passing of Bruce Peret, it is apparent more than ever that we (i.e. members of ISUS) now face the challenge of clarifying where the RST stands, in the context of the organization. Therefore, this topic is intended to clarify the work of the LRC in this historical context, which will require...

Ok. thanks for removing them Dj. That will help. Now, the remaining questions are: What is this third fundamental factor of nature that is bigger than space and time? Is motion not your fundamental factor with space and time being a reciprocal relationship of this? Is your frame of reference as an o...

As I continue answering Dj's questions here, his confusion is becoming more and clear to me. Not only does he not have a grasp of the LRC research, he has confused the words of an unknown commentor on my site with my words and instead of removing them as I requested him to do, he has left them intac...

Thanks for doing that Dj. Now, I will continue answering your questions here, for the benefit of others who may be interested, even though you are not. Feel free to ignore it totally. Last night I was thinking about the statement Djchrismac made, in response to my assertion that he hadn't ever quest...