DFT-13b: Worked Example: Proper-Time, Lorentz Factor, and the Energy–Momentum Relation

Discussion concerning the first major re-evaluation of Dewey B. Larson's Reciprocal System of theory, updated to include counterspace (Etheric spaces), projective geometry, and the non-local aspects of time/space.
Post Reply
MWells
Posts: 190
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:29 pm

DFT-13b: Worked Example: Proper-Time, Lorentz Factor, and the Energy–Momentum Relation

Post by MWells »

DFT-13 showed that relativity emerges from budget allocation between the S-frame and T-frame.
DFT-13b now makes that fully explicit using SI-unit conversion and one symbolic worked example.

No assumption of Lorentz invariance.
No spacetime postulates.

Everything comes from:

|\Delta x|^{2} + |\Delta\theta|^{2} = |\Delta\sigma|^{2}

1. Identifications and Conversions

The intrinsic scalar progression parameter is 𝜆.
The S-frame observes:

spatial displacement: Δ𝑥
coordinate time: Δ𝑡
proper time: Δ𝜏

We map:

|\Delta x| = v\,\Delta t

|\Delta\sigma| = c\,\Delta t

Thus:

\frac{|\Delta x|}{|\Delta\sigma|} = \frac{v}{c}

2. Proper Time from Projection Geometry

Start with the projection relation:

|\Delta\theta|^{2} = |\Delta\sigma|^{2} - |\Delta x|^{2}

Normalize:

\frac{|\Delta\theta|^{2}}{|\Delta\sigma|^{2}} = 1 - \left(\frac{v}{c}\right)^{2}

The proper-time increment is:

\Delta\tau = \frac{|\Delta\theta|}{|\Delta\sigma|}\,\Delta t

Thus:

\Delta\tau = \sqrt{1 - \left(\frac{v}{c}\right)^{2}}\,\Delta t

This is exact time dilation obtained without relativity postulates.

3. Lorentz Factor Emerges Automatically

Rewriting the above:

\frac{\Delta t}{\Delta\tau} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}}}}

So the Lorentz factor is:

\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}}}}

4. Energy and Momentum from Budget Fractions

Let:

K = |\Delta x|^{2}

U = |\Delta\theta|^{2}

Then:

K + U = |\Delta\sigma|^{2}

After conversion from normalized units:

E = \gamma m c^{2}

p = \gamma m v

Eliminate 𝛾:

E^{2} = p^{2}c^{2} + m^{2}c^{4}

Thus the relativistic energy–momentum relation is just the projection constraint expressed in SI units.

5. Worked Symbolic Example

Let the speed be:

v = 0.6\,c

Then:

K = (0.6)^{2} = 0.36

U = 1 - 0.36 = 0.64

Thus:

\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-0.36}} = 1.25

Proper-time relation:

\Delta\tau = \frac{1}{1.25}\,\Delta t = 0.8\,\Delta t

Energy and momentum:

E = 1.25\, m c^{2}

p = 1.25\,m(0.6c) = 0.75,mc

Check consistency:

p^{2}c^{2} = (0.75\,mc)^{2}c^{2} = 0.5625\,m^{2}c^{4}

m^{2}c^{4} = 1.0000\,m^{2}c^{4}

E^{2} = (1.25\,mc^{2})^{2} = 1.5625\,m^{2}c^{4}

And indeed:

p^{2}c^{2} + m^{2}c^{4} = 1.5625\,m^{2}c^{4} = E^{2}

6. Why This Matters

DFT-13b shows:

𝛾 comes from projection budget, not Lorentz postulates.
Δ𝜏 is the leftover scalar progression after spatial demand.
𝐸2=𝑝2𝑐2+𝑚2𝑐4 is algebraically identical to the projection equation.

Relativity's algebra is not arbitrary; it is geometric.
Post Reply