Reciprocal System Research Society

It's become clear that something in the cosmos just doesn't add up.

In fact, it's expanding at a much faster rate than it should.

For some time now [Ed's translation: whole careers] there's been a mismatch in observations of the early universe done with the European Space Agency's Planck Telescope and what astronomers see when they measure the more nearby, modern parts of space with NASA's Hubble Telescope.

Riess says the discrepancy strongly suggests there's a piece missing in the puzzle that scientists have put together over the years to model the history of the universe.

The actual explanation remains a mystery.

bperet wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2019 10:37 am Something --daniel posted to his Facebook...
RRWilson-on-TOE.jpg

user737 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:47 pm Nuclear power works, this I can absolutely attest to. I want to learn more about how it really works and how we can improve the process.

user737 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 13, 2019 9:14 am If everything is based on scale, then if a micro-explosion cannot be demonstrated, neither can a larger explosion

bperet wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2019 1:41 pm

user737 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 13, 2019 9:14 am If everything is based on scale, then if a micro-explosion cannot be demonstrated, neither can a larger explosion

This is an interesting observation. In Nature, it takes a supernova to make a nuclear bomb. I just don't see how it can be accomplished on a smaller scale--as Larson states, "anything that can exist, it does exist." I don't see any nuclear bombs occurring in Nature on any scale other than stellar.

Djchrismac wrote:Sorry but you're quoting Sunfire of the Silver Legion and Veteran's Today... that's enough for me to know that the "mini-nukes" theory is distracting from the truth... how can you have a mini nuclear explosion? And why no reports of radiation allover New York?
https://fora.conscioushugs.com/viewtopi ... nuke#p6091

daniel wrote: ↑Sun Mar 19, 2017 4:00 pm

soldierhugsmember wrote: ↑Sun Mar 19, 2017 6:01 am Khalezov has put out a lot of material on mini-nukes.
There's been loads of those over the years - the media call them massive car bombs or fertilizer explosions
The Bali bomb was a mini-nuke
The Okie bombing was also a mini-nuke

I have a problem with that, because, even after over a thousand tests in French Polynesia in the last 50 years, they have yet to get a "big nuke" to work. And the problem is "insufficient fissionable material." I could not conceive of how they could get one to work with even less material. Sounds like misdirection.
https://fora.conscioushugs.com/viewtopi ... nuke#p6095

Let’s sum it up. Did Einstein play a role in the creation of the atomic bomb? Of course — his physics isn’t irrelevant, and his letter to Roosevelt did start one phase of the work. But both of these things are less prominent than the Time-magazine-cover-understanding makes them out to be. They weren’t central to what became the Manhattan Project, and if you could somehow, magically, remove Einstein from the equation, it isn’t at all clear that the atomic bomb wouldn’t have been built around the time it actually was built. I don’t think you can really credit, or blame, Einstein for the atomic bomb, in any direct fashion. Einstein did play a role in things, but that role wasn’t as crucial, central, or direct as a lot of people imagine. If you could magically drop him out of history, I think very little in terms of atomic bombs would have been affected.

So why does the Einstein and the bomb myth persist? Why does everybody learn about the Einstein letter, if it wasn’t really was sparked the Manhattan Project? There are two answers here, I think. One is that Einstein was, even before the war, one of the best-known, best-recognized physicists of the 20th century, and was synonymous with revolutionary science and genius. Having him “predict” the atomic bomb with equations in 1905 — 40 years before one was set off — is the kind of “genius-story” that people love, even if it obscures more than it enlightens. It also has a high irony quotient, since Einstein was forced to flee from Germany when the Nazis took power.

But there’s another, perhaps more problematic aspect. In many early copies of the Smyth Report that were distributed by the government, copies of the Einstein letter were mimeographed and loosely inserted. The magnification of Einstein’s role was purposefully encouraged by the government in the immediate period after using the weapon. (And it was even a convenient myth for Einstein, as it magnified his own importance and thus potential influence.) Hanging the atomic bomb on Einstein’s head was an act of self-justification, of sorts. Einstein was the world’s greatest genius in the eyes of the public, and he was a well-known pacifist, practically a scientific saint. After all, if Einstein thought building a bomb was necessary, who could argue with him?





http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2014/06/ ... -einstein/

Atom bombs do not work
The original newspaper release was that Nagasaki and Hiroshima were fire bombed like Tokyo and it was only later that the story of the Abomb surfaced. All brick buildings were left standing, including the Bank of Japan which is still in use today. No residue “radiation”..
No Atom bombs have ever been used even during the Vietnam war where every other despicable weapon was used including chemicals. The USA lost this war.
No dictator or mad leaderr has ever used nuclear weapons.
All photos and film of atomic explosions are easily proven fake http://mileswmathis.com/trinity.pdf
Various scientists have shown the actual mechanics of an Abomb are not workable http://heiwaco.tripod.com/bomb.htm

The Atomic bomb hoax was thought up by the USA, Russia and UK after WWII. Various other countries have been let into the hoax. The idea is to keep the masses in constant fear.

Not one single nuclear weapon large or small has ever been used.

Logical conclusion:- They don’t work
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/too ... o_not_work

Nuclear weapons are 100% US/USSR (Russia)/Japanese collusion, infringements, infractions, stupid propaganda, lies, pseudoscience or bad science and history fiction. It upsets many American and Japan State Boards of Education (or Indoctrination), SBOEs, that force teachers to tell pupils that US scientists and engineers top secretly (hm!) developed atomic bombs 1942/5 at enormous costs using the best brains in the world. It is a scandal that nobody wants to talk about today.