is RS really a philosophy rather than a science?

Discussion concerning the first major re-evaluation of Dewey B. Larson's Reciprocal System of theory, updated to include counterspace (Etheric spaces), projective geometry, and the non-local aspects of time/space.
Post Reply
duane
Posts: 139
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 5:46 pm

is RS really a philosophy rather than a science?

Post by duane » Wed Sep 05, 2018 6:43 pm

maybe the problem of acceptance is that you're talking to the wrong department

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTNON7Rz1PY&t=1s

User avatar
bperet
Posts: 1428
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 1:43 am
Location: 7.5.3.84.70.24.606
Contact:

Re: is RS really a philosophy rather than a science?

Post by bperet » Thu Sep 06, 2018 8:19 pm

That is a very good point. One worth considering.
Every dogma has its day...

duane
Posts: 139
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 5:46 pm

Re: is RS really a philosophy rather than a science?

Post by duane » Fri Sep 07, 2018 4:23 pm

I think a series of discussions with you and Dr Mislove on New Thinking Allowed
would be very enlightening and entertaining. He seems to be a very good interviewer

Post Reply