QM Contd...
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 3:03 am
Hi everyone,
Quote:
Is this in any way connected to merely taking different 'sections' so to speak,of the motion,so that according to the type of interaction 'section' we see the corresponding property of the motion?In the chapter on Light,there are concepts like 'metric linkages' and 'affine linkages'....maybe these are the 'sections'.Any other reference to get to understand it better?
Quote:
Cheers,
Gopi
Quote:
Just musing....But I am coming to the conclusion that there is no "wave-particle" duality, at all, and that it is simply an artifact of our perception, and the instruments we use to augment our perception. (It will be a tough concept to explain.)
Is this in any way connected to merely taking different 'sections' so to speak,of the motion,so that according to the type of interaction 'section' we see the corresponding property of the motion?In the chapter on Light,there are concepts like 'metric linkages' and 'affine linkages'....maybe these are the 'sections'.Any other reference to get to understand it better?
Quote:
They use X-rays in almost all of the cases.gopiv wrote:
What I meant to ask was,how is the charged electron detected by the photons,do the photons merely bounce back from the electron as is elaborated in the "Compton scattering"?
What speed range of photons are they using, visible/radio or X-ray/hard uV?
Cheers,
Gopi