Page 1 of 1
Nasa validates 'impossible' space drive
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 10:17 am
by variable
So the rumored microwave propulsion device is indeed real. Does RS2 theory have an explanation on how this device that should not produce thrust does?
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/201 ... pace-drive
I just found out about this
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:38 pm
by davelook
I just found out about this and I'm blown away. I really hope it's real. Seems too good to be true!
Hey Bruce, been awhile!
Space Drives
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 11:18 pm
by bperet
IMHO, that looks more like "gimme grant money" than anything useful as a space drive. From what I can tell of the report, they found a way to "circularly polarize" a microwave, which produces torque and therefore thrust. The effect has been known for a LONG time... Nehru mentioned it in one of his papers on birotation, written 30 years ago.
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 1:36 pm
by duane
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/emdrive-britis ... ce-1556098
EmDrive: British scientist's 'new physics' theory accidentally proves controversial space propulsion works
British physicist Dr Mike McCulloch of Plymouth University has presented predicted results on a new theory of inertia that match the order of magnitude of thrust on all experiments done so far on the controversial electromagnetic space propulsion technology EmDrive.
McCulloch's research involves violating Einstein's Equivalence principle by stating that there is a new acceleration extracted from the zero-point field by horizons, and that if inertia were to be quantised at small accelerations, this would explain the anomalous thrust produced by the EmDrive
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/emdrive-nasa-e ... ow-1578716
EmDrive: Nasa Eagleworks' paper has finally passed peer review, says scientist in the know