Reciprocal System Research Society

Hi to all

A quick question concerning the graviational limit.

Is there a gravitational limit inside unit space (GL*) so that if you push two particles sufficiently close together against the gravitation acting inside unit space ( G*) then eventually you will reach a point inside unit space where G*=P*? (where P* is the progression inside unit space).

Furthermore if you continue to push until P* > G*, will the particles then continue by them selves to unit inverse speed much the same way when two particles are sufficiently seperated outside unit space and reach a seperation past GL where P > G and ultimately reach unit speed?

Thanks.

Is there a gravitational limit inside unit space (GL*) so that if you push two particles sufficiently close together against the gravitation acting inside unit space ( G*) then eventually you will reach a point inside unit space where G*=P*? (where P* is the progression inside unit space).

That is a fascinating question... logically, yes, there would be a "gravitational limit" inside unit space, because the unit space boundary is just separating 3D space from 3D time. But it may not be observed as such because outside, the gravitational limit has units of gravity, s³/t³, so inside would be the inverse, t³/s³, which is more of a "mass limit" than a gravitational one, since those are units of mass.

Thinking about it, I think Prof. Nehru may have identified this (and calculated its value) in his paper on Wave Mechanics, calling it the "atomic region," (a 3D limit) being separated from the "nuclear region," (a 1D limit).

Furthermore if you continue to push until P* > G*, will the particles then continue by them selves to unit inverse speed much the same way when two particles are sufficiently seperated outside unit space and reach a seperation past GL where P > G and ultimately reach unit speed?

I'll admit that this situation never occurred to me before, so I'm going to have to think about it for a bit. If we use the analogous situation on the outside of the gravitational limit, and push an asteroid or something outside the GL of our solar system, it will progress away just as the distant galaxies do and begin a process of aggregation from the cosmic microwave background radiation on its journey to becoming a sun.

Inverting that, if you were to push two atoms close enough together such that the net motion went past this "mass limit" in 3D time, that atom would continue to progress away from the atomic rotation of the first--in 3D time, rather than in 3D space. Because the rotational structure of that atom would not be compatible with the 3D time environment, it would explode into a bunch of particles, seeking stability. Ah--that situation is observed in space at an astronomical level. It is called a "gamma ray burst," which would be a large aggregate of atoms in this situation.

Looks like you may have made an interesting discovery here!

hi Bruce

That is a fascinating question... logically, yes, there would be a "gravitational limit" inside unit space, because the unit space boundary is just separating 3D space from 3D time. But it may not be observed as such because outside, the gravitational limit has units of gravity, s3/t3, so inside would be the inverse, t3/s3, which is more of a "mass limit" than a gravitational one, since those are units of mass.

so would the "gravitationall limit" and "mass limit" prevent Black Holes from forming

since they are suppose to be gravitational collaspse without limits?

so would the "gravitationall limit" and "mass limit" prevent Black Holes from forming since they are suppose to be gravitational collaspse without limits?

No more than it would prevent honest government from ruling countries... in reality, neither exist.

Black holes are a misidentification of astronomical objects exhibiting faster-than-light motion. Remember, light moves at the speed of light (obviously), and therefore could never catch up with faster-than-light objects, so you get the appearance of light being swallowed by a hole, since the FTL object is "consuming" the slower photons--not the other way around, which we are used to.