Reciprocal System Research Society

http://phys.org/news/2013-05-cosmic-gli ... denly.html

"This neutron star is doing something completely unexpected. Its speed of rotation has been dropping at an increasingly rapid rate ever since the initial sudden decrease in its spin."

......

"These discoveries confront astronomers with a new theoretical challenge. What exactly could cause the magnetar's X-ray outburst, then the abrupt slowdown of its rotation, and now the even faster deceleration of the star's rotation that the Swift observatory is continuing to detect?"

I am trying to apply what I read here, on what Bruce's blog on how planets were formed. My initial thought was that all the mass that exploded into "counter space" region is finally returning to the material sector, so when it slows down enough to say a speed equal to that of our sun, it will expand and be just a sun.

But Bruce's blog show how, when there is a magnetic field, and a electric field 90 degrees, this causes the rotation. So is the star losing its magnetic or electric field?

Jeret

X-rays are produced when FTL matter drops to sub-light speeds. This means that the star's explosion products are beginning to drop back from 3D time to 3D space. See Larson's paper, Astronomical X-Ray Sources for details.

This "neutron star" is not made of neutrons, but is just the core of a star that went supernova, exploding in time instead of space. That big debris field around it is the outer layer that exploded in space. Enough time has passed that, like the spatial debris field, the temporal debris field has stopped expanding, and is contracting--IN TIME--and the material is losing its temporal, FTL motion and is dropping back into space.

What you will see in the future is not just a slowing down of "rotation," but an increase in the star's physical size. Remember that "inward in time" (temporal gravity) is "outward in space", due to the reciprocal relation between space and time. Temporal gravity is spatial expansion.

BTW, it probably isn't spinning at all, or if it is, the rotation is very slow like most stars. It is just a pulse rate, which Larson describes as quantized, radiative emission. Any time you move to FTL speeds, emission becomes discrete--quantized--as a series of pulses, not a continuous distribution. Astronomy does not accept FTL motion, so they are ignorant of this option and have to resort to the spinning rays for an explanation.

What you have is a star that is dropping from ultra-high motion (3-x, pulsar) to intermediate speed motion (2-x, white dwarf).