In regards to "quantum foam solar panel".
bperet wrote:
The idea is pretty simple... rather than using photons to knock electrons from atoms into the conduction band, you use photons to knock electrons out of the quantum foam, into the conduction band. Virtually every photon produces a conductive electron, pushing near 100% efficiency. I haven't figure out what material yet.
BTW, a clarification regarding silicon -- there is no lack of silicon, just the lack of the high grade processed kind used in PV cells.
In regards to your idea, Nehru mentions in his paper on Superconductivity the "antiferromagnetic" property (where antiferromagnetic meaning two nearby magnetic dipoles will tend to align in opposite directions) and stated:
Quote:
We can conclude that the antiferromagnetic ordering can co-exist with or even promote the electron pairing that underlies superconductivity. If this is so, it might lead to the develpoment of high Tc superconducting materials by exploiting the potential of the antiferromagnetic type of structures.
I am only speculating, but how about a sort of "inverse incandescent light bulb", a vacuum tube (containing CMB) could be a kind of "quantum foam matrix" that uses electrodes that are antiferromagnetic materials for promotion of conduction.
There are probably more "natural" approaches to creating this process in terms of 4th density technology.
In regards to tetrahedral concepts:
bperet wrote:
Nehru and I looked at tetrahedral relationships back in 2003; I think they are in the "Time Region Speeds" thread. I did some experimenting, and came up with this:
The cube is actually composed of a pair of reciprocally-related tetrahedrons (a configuration called a "star tetrahedron", where you connect the vertices to form a cube). If you take one tetrahedron and call it "material", and the other "cosmic"--even though the tetrahedron has 4 DOF, when linked, the result is three, coordinate dimensions in the typical axial representation. Also, the two tetrahedrons are out of phase with each other by 90 degrees--the same phase relationship we see with space and time.
This indicates that space and time, the material and cosmic sectors, are very closely linked and that the Euclidean geometry that Larson postulated is actually a by-product of the linkage of space and time. It can be deduced as a consequence--doesn't need to be postulated at all!
I read that thread some time ago and now it's more clear as to how this "star tetrahedron" works.
This may be a stretch but if you consider the octahedral formed within the star tetrahedron and the "linking effect" to both sectors if you were to inscribe a sphere within the octahedral it creates 8 tangent points on the octahedral to form a cube which if inscribed again by a sphere creates 6 tangent points to create an octahedral and repeats this series of cube - sphere - octahedral - sphere - cube...
Question: Is this basically a model for the superposition and intersection of sectors (and the respective space and time units) and possibly of a connection to how atomic structures may appear? I haven't read those posts related to your "atomic zone" research in a while so I'm stretching again here.
Also, for some reason, I've visualized absolute locations as possibly archetypal and manifesting as star tetrahedrons of perhaps the "Planck length" of order of 10^-33 cm. (which Wikipedia states: "The Planck length is deemed "natural" because it can be defined from three fundamental physical constants: the speed of light, Planck's constant, and the gravitational constant.") The undefined "core vibration" concept mentioned by RA has prompted this consideration.
bperet wrote:
I did a graphic representation; see attached. Red tetrahedron represents the material sector (space/time); the green tetrahedron represents the cosmic sector (time/space); the white cube is the linkage that results between them, generating three axial dimensions.
Looks like the cubic circumscribed formation which leads to derivation of rectangular Euclidean geometry. Whereas the inscribed spherical can lead to derivation of Euclidean polar geometry. Does this make sense?
Also I recall the RA session (#52) regarding the 90 degree phase difference relating to a mode of travel:
Quote:
Question: Just as something that I am a little inquisitive about, but which is not of much importance, I would like to make a statement which I intuitively hunch. I may be wrong.
You were speaking of the slingshot effect and that term has puzzled me.
The only thing that I can see is that you must put energy into a craft until it approaches the velocity of light and this of course requires more and more energy. The time dilation occurs and it seems to me that it would be possible to, by moving at 90° to the direction of travel, somehow change this stored energy in its application of direction or sense so that you move out of space/time into time/space with a 90° deflection. Then the energy would be taken out in time/space and you would re-enter space/time at the end of this energy burst. Am I in any way correct on this?
I am Ra. You are quite correct as far as your language may take you and, due to your training, more able than we to express the concept. Our only correction, if you will, would be to suggest that the 90° of which you speak are an angle which may best be understood as a portion of a tesseract.
This may be useful to helping to explain to the mainstream how RS principles can be applied to something new and interesting.