Astronomy and material/cosmic linkage

Discussion of the astronomical and cosmological aspects of a universe of motion.
Post Reply
User avatar
bperet
Posts: 1501
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 1:43 am
Location: 7.5.3.84.70.24.606
Contact:

Astronomy and material/cosmic linkage

Post by bperet »

In Larson's astronomy, there is a constant exchange of motion between the two sectors of the Universe. The primary manifestations of this exchange are the cosmic background radiation (CBR, inflowing particles from stellar combustion), and gamma ray bursts (GRBs, inverse-matter ejecta from stellar and galactic explosions moving into the 3-x speed range).

In the simple, scalar picture, it is nothing more than changes in speed, from one extreme to the other. There is no sharing, or composite motion between the two realms. Larson refers to this as "Level 1 - inanimate" (also known as "first density").

I have been recently reading "The Cosmic Doctrine", by Dion Fortune, and it has some interesting concepts in it. She does describe a universe based solely on motion, and has many features that are in agreement with Larson. But she carries it a step further with the concept of the Logos, which adds an idea of "intelligence" or "life" to structures such as planets, stars, stellar neighborhoods, galaxies, galactic neighborhoods, supergalaxies and cosmic bubbles.

Nehru, in his post on Conjugate Sectors wrote:
This has some significance that we need to recognize explicitly. Consider the quantity speed [s/t]. The corresponding pertinent quantity in the counterspace of the Time Region (of the Material Sector) is the INVERSE speed [t/s], which manifests to us as energy, as we already know. Now if we consider the quantity pertaining to the Cosmic Sector, namely, the CONJUGATE speed [t/s], it manifests to us not merely as the material energy, but as PRANA---the self-organizing power of LIFE---apparent in all the living systems.
If one considers Nick Thomas' work on "counterspace linkage" (an integral part of RS2), which is the "speed/energy" relationship of the time region, one must also consider a similar "conjugate linkage" between speed and PRANA, as Nehru defines it. This has some interesting characteristics.

From a material point-of-view, a cosmic galaxy would not be visible because it is non-local from that perspective. Even though localized in time, would be randomly distributed throughout space. However, what happens if the stars comprising a cosmic galaxy have "conjugate linkage" to the material sector, due to their intermediate and ultra-high-speed motion? In other words, if what the metaphysicians say is true, and structures like stars and galaxies are "living", then they have such a conjugate linkage, because "prana" IS "life."

How does that change things? The points of linkage will be LOCALIZED in BOTH the material and cosmic sectors, and each sector will respond to that sector's gravity, forming similar, structural relationships. Simply put, cosmic stars and galaxies will be "detectable" in the material sector, and will have localized structure.

I quote "detectable", because they will not necessarily be "visible." The only motions that can move freely between the material and cosmic sectors are the sub-atomic particles, with a net motion of 1 or 2 units of displacement (such that they have no net effect outside of the unit boundary). This limits the possibilites to photons, positrons/electrons, and neutrinos. Positrons and electrons are readily absorbed by matter in the material sector, so they will probably remain undetected. Neutrinos tend to pass thru matter, so it would be very difficult to identify their flight paths to get any type of orientation to their source. Photons, however, are detectable and tend to travel very far in space.

But what kind of photons? Remember conjugate relationships. A "visible" cosmic photon would be viewed in the material sector as an X-ray. Radio c-photons would be viewed as Cosmic and Gamma rays. However, photons near the unit speed level, in the infrared according to Larson, would still be detected as infrared -- the only difference being that "near" infrared would become "far" infrared, and vice versa, as the unit speed boundary sits between near and far infrared. And this infrared signature, along with X, cosmic and gamma rays, would be localized in the space of the material sector.

Since we are crossing the unit speed boundary, the inter-regional ratio of 154:1 must also apply. Thus, we should observe IR sources that are very massive, in the neighborhood of 150 times larger than your average, supergiant star. Curiously enough, the IRR seems to be a cut-off point for stars, in general:

HubbleSite wrote:
The heaviest-weight stars are blue-white super giants. They may get as large as 150 solar masses.
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/newsde ... 05/image/b
But we're looking for something very big and red... and that brings us to "infrared protostars". A quick search on the Internet will reveal a large number of papers talking about infrared protostars and their unusual relationship with "intense X-ray emissions"--cosmic "visible light"--something you wouldn't expect for relatively "cool" stellar matter.

Legacy astronomers assume that what they are witnessing is a star in the very early "birth" process. We have now identified the infrared protostar as the "conjugate-prana" localization of a cosmic star. Both situations, however, may be true, because the density gradient of the infrared photons will interact and heat local matter, which may, in time, actually form a material-sector star in the same location.

We also know from "Beyond Space and Time", that this linkage between a material unit and a cosmic unit is what Larson calls a "life unit" -- and that when a material star forms at the location of a cosmic star (or vice-versa), it will form a gigantic "life unit" that is known as a "Logos."

On the astronomical scale, these stellar Logoi may be viewed as mere "cells" in a larger organism, a galactic Logos. Therefore, the large-scale structure of the universe should show stars forming into galaxies, galaxies into galactic groups, and groups into superclusters -- and all these structures should manifest geometric relationships similar to what we commonly observe as the galactic shapes, defined by age, according to Larson's galactic evolutionary process.

But what of cosmic galaxies, and their infrared protrustions into our local environment? Same rules apply... Inter-regional ratio and structure. However, we should observe, if we can get a telescope large and sensitive enough, super-infrared-galaxies, many times larger than any galaxies we observe in the visible range.

I've been looking, but have yet to find any such item on the Internet. If you happen to spot one, please post.

Attached is a computer-generated image of such cosmic galaxy, as it should appear in the sky. (Infrared false colored to red so you can see it. As usual with attachments, you need to log in to the forum to view it).
Attachments
Cosmic, super-infrared-galaxy
Cosmic, super-infrared-galaxy
CosmicGalaxy.jpg (33.78 KiB) Viewed 6627 times
Every dogma has its day...
Phillip
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 am

Astronomy and material/cosmic linkage

Post by Phillip »

Bruce said, "However, we should observe, if we can get a telescope large

and sensitive enough, super-infrared-galaxies, many times larger than any

galaxies we observe in the visible range."

Would you expect these super-infrared-galaxies (SIG) to be so large that

we would need to computer connect multiple pictures? Would you expect

the SIG frequency spectra to be narrow band and/or focused? In other

words, how would I tell an astronomer with an infrared telescope to

identify one of these things. It would seem easy to mistake for an

unusual dispersed background radiation pattern, especially for a narrow

image scope.
User avatar
bperet
Posts: 1501
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 1:43 am
Location: 7.5.3.84.70.24.606
Contact:

Re: Astronomy and material/cosmic linkage

Post by bperet »

Phillip wrote:
Would you expect these super-infrared-galaxies (SIG) to be so large that we would need to computer connect multiple pictures?
Depends on your field of view, I would assume.

Phillip wrote:
Would you expect the SIG frequency spectra to be narrow band and/or focused?
I would expect it to be scattered from infrared, all the way thru red, because of the changes of frequency that occur during the very long distances from source to observer.

Phillip wrote:
In other words, how would I tell an astronomer with an infrared telescope to identify one of these things. It would seem easy to mistake for an unusual dispersed background radiation pattern, especially for a narrow image scope.
Big, red, and dim. You would have to use long-term exposures of a wide field and bandpass just the infrared band, to eliminate other sources of light.

And who knows... maybe the background radiation pattern is part of the structure. Good chance it will be influenced by it.

Not sure I could give you a size estimate, particularly since they recently discovered that the galaxies they have photographed are actually about twice the size of what they appear to be on film.

I would estimate a diameter of 15,000,000 light years or so.
Every dogma has its day...
Post Reply