Earth's Magnetic Field

Discussion of the astronomical and cosmological aspects of a universe of motion.
Post Reply
User avatar
bperet
Posts: 1501
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 1:43 am
Location: 7.5.3.84.70.24.606
Contact:

Earth's Magnetic Field

Post by bperet » Mon Jul 02, 2018 11:09 am

Riddle me this... the strength of the Earth's magnetic field is about 50 microTeslas, which is about 1/20th the strength of a refrigerator magnet. So how can this magnetic field, which drops exponentially as it reaches out into space, manage to block all the matter and charged particles from a solar flare smashing against it?

The basic math is simple, B = B0 (RE/r)3, where B0=31200 nT and RE=6371 km. The radius to the bow shock wave of the magnetosphere is about 90,000 km, which gives a field strength of 11 nT.

As usual, something does not "add up" here. The solar wind, alone, impacts the magnetosphere at 400 km/s. When you include ejected matter from a solar flare... I just do not see how this tiny of a magnetic field can stop it. I've looked at the equations, but they just appear to be fudging the parameters to make the system work--not real measurements. (Same problem with astronomical distance errors, where they just "scale up" the objects to fit the equations.)

If we look at an old television tube, it is basically an electron gun firing "charged particles" that are deflected by a magnetic field, just like the van Allen belts are doing with the charged particles of the sun. An electron is emitted around the 10 kV range, a tiny fraction of the energy of one from a solar flare. The magnetic field strength needed to deflect this is around 3 mT--272 times larger than the 11 nT field strength of the magnetosphere. Common sense says that this cannot work, as described, so something else is going on here.

I did some research on the Earth's magnetic field (field strength in nT):
.
FieldIntensityEquatorial.jpg
Field Intensity, Equatorial
FieldIntensityEquatorial.jpg (1.24 MiB) Viewed 6862 times
FieldIntensityNorth.jpg
Field Intensity, North (south magnetic pole)
FieldIntensityNorth.jpg (556.77 KiB) Viewed 6862 times
FieldIntensitySouth.jpg
Field Intensity, South (north magnetic pole)
FieldIntensitySouth.jpg (615.25 KiB) Viewed 6862 times
.
The Antarctic pole makes sense (the north magnetic pole), because the location of the pole is where the field intensity is about the strongest. But the Arctic pole makes no sense--it is located at a point out in the middle of nowhere. One would expect to see the contour lines surrounding it, as it does in the south, not in the middle of two other high-intensity fields to the east and west.

When I look at these maps, I see FOUR poles, not "two ends of a bar magnet." They get the dipole model from a "horizontal field intensity" system, which is responsible for how a compass points--the vertical component is omitted. This gives a more classic distribution, with one exception off the western side of Africa--the magnitude component is omitted:
.
FieldInclination.jpg
Field Inclination
FieldInclination.jpg (1.17 MiB) Viewed 6862 times
.
Edmund Halley had done quite a bit of research on the Earth's magnetic field, concluding that there were four "shells" needed to explain this structure, which led to his "hollow Earth" model of concentric shells, rotating at different speeds. Of course, this is now ignored--yet, they still use this structure in disguise (much like the aether)... in this case, their "shells" are the upper and lower mantle, and inner and outer core. These shells are quite likely to exist--not as rocky shells, but as speed ranges, a concept unique to the Reciprocal System, documented in the Part V --daniel paper.

In the RS, there are two forms of magnetism, one due to 2D rotation (Larson's "magnetic rotation"), which is a static field that we see expressed as a component of gravitational attraction. The other is the magnetic charge, a 2D rotational vibration (a solid vibration of 720°) that first appears in the neutrino. Because the magnetic charge varies in clock time, this is the one we can directly measure. What is actually being measured is not the strength of the Earth's magnetic field, but the strength of the magnetic charge OF the field.

What I suspect is going on, is that the Earth's magnetosphere is actually the static, 2D rotational form of measurement, that we have no instrumentality to measure--until it gets clobbered by charged particles. The charge of the particles will impose a charge on the magnetic rotation, creating a 2D rotational vibration--something we CAN measure as the "bow shock" and magnetopause. And this imposed charge is creating a magnetic response that is millions of times more intense than the 11 nT field they think is out there... enough to deflect all these energetic particles easily.

Essentially, it works like a Star Trek deflector shield, or the city shield of Stargate Atlantis. An energy weapon directed against it (beams of charged particles), hits the rotational field and charges it up, causing the weapon charge to be distributed across the field, dissipating it:
.
SGA-city-shield.jpg
Atlantis City Shield under attack
SGA-city-shield.jpg (33.02 KiB) Viewed 6862 times
.
The Wraith weapons hitting the shield (which should be invisible) cause the charge reaction, creating magnetic charge to dissipate it and the photon vibration of emitted light (aurora). Quite accurate! (This is probably how the force shield designed by Tesla worked.)
Every dogma has its day...

user737
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2018 7:39 pm
Location: Near Colorado Springs, CO

The Earth's Magnetic Field is changing

Post by user737 » Fri Jan 11, 2019 8:39 am

https://www.news.com.au/technology/scie ... 6c6097be9d

Or rather the charge on the magnetic field. Regardless, a change is now clearly evident.
Infinite Rider on the Big Dogma

User avatar
bperet
Posts: 1501
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 1:43 am
Location: 7.5.3.84.70.24.606
Contact:

Re: The Earth's Magnetic Field is changing

Post by bperet » Fri Jan 11, 2019 9:25 am

user737 wrote:
Fri Jan 11, 2019 8:39 am
https://www.news.com.au/technology/scie ... 6c6097be9d

Or rather the charge on the magnetic field. Regardless, a change is now clearly evident.
article wrote:Earth’s magnetic pole is on the move, fast. And we don’t know why

Earth’s magnetic field is what allows us to exist. It deflects harmful radiation. It keeps our water and atmosphere in place. But now it’s acting up — and nobody knows why.
I wrote a paper on it back in 1996, based on Prof. KVK Nehru's sunspot research: At the Earth's Core: The Geophysics of Planetary Evolution

But at the rate it is moving... get ready for a magnetic pole flip soon!
Every dogma has its day...

user737
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2018 7:39 pm
Location: Near Colorado Springs, CO

South Atlantic Anomaly

Post by user737 » Thu May 21, 2020 11:03 am

The charge on the Earth's magnetic field is reducing. Planetary magnetic ionization levels is increasing. Sun's magnetic ionization level is decreasing as stellar evolution continues unabated. I suspect we reach a local minimum and sol will move to the next phase very rapidly. Soon.
bperet wrote:
Mon Jul 02, 2018 11:09 am
The Antarctic pole makes sense (the north magnetic pole), because the location of the pole is where the field intensity is about the strongest. But the Arctic pole makes no sense--it is located at a point out in the middle of nowhere. One would expect to see the contour lines surrounding it, as it does in the south, not in the middle of two other high-intensity fields to the east and west.

When I look at these maps, I see FOUR poles, not "two ends of a bar magnet." They get the dipole model from a "horizontal field intensity" system, which is responsible for how a compass points--the vertical component is omitted. This gives a more classic distribution, with one exception off the western side of Africa--the magnitude component is omitted:
Satellites and spacecraft malfunction as Earth's magnetic field mysteriously weakens
https://news.sky.com/story/earths-magne ... g-11992022
On average the planet's magnetic field has lost almost 10% of its strength over the last two centuries, but there is a large localised region of weakness stretching from Africa to South America.

Known as the South Atlantic Anomaly, the field strength in this area has rapidly shrunk over the past 50 years just as the area itself has grown and moved westward.
Infinite Rider on the Big Dogma

User avatar
Djchrismac
Posts: 130
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:14 pm

Re: Earth's Magnetic Field

Post by Djchrismac » Tue May 26, 2020 5:05 am

The big question is - reducing and splitting naturally or because the Ascension island UFO base is around where this South Atlantic anomaly is?

http://mileswmathis.com/nro.pdf

http://mileswmathis.com/NRO2.pdf
"Over the past five years, a second centre of minimum intensity has emerged southwest of Africa—indicating that the South Atlantic Anomaly could split up into two separate cells."

"The new, eastern minimum of the South Atlantic Anomaly has appeared over the last decade and in recent years is developing vigorously. We are very lucky to have the Swarm satellites in orbit to investigate the development of the South Atlantic Anomaly. The challenge now is to understand the processes in Earth's core driving these changes."

https://phys.org/news/2020-05-swarm-pro ... netic.html
Since they will never read Bruce's incredible paper i'll give them a clue, the Earth's core is NOT a big ball of magma! :D

What is really interesting is to look back to 2014 when the anomaly was east of Africa, check out the weakness in the field where Ascension island is:

Image

https://www.livescience.com/46694-magne ... akens.html

Image

It could be that the split is due to the natural anomaly moving westwards over the man-made UFO anomaly of Ascension Island.

The only thing is that Ascension Island doesn't really match up for this new split:

Image

It doesn't look like this animation screenshot provides the full magnetic anomaly picture though. Alternatives that match the smaller anomaly better geographically could be Tristan da Cunha or Saint Helena, both owned by Britain and the Queen, you can tell the parasitical satanic "elite" are active on there - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Hel ... se_scandal.

Saint Helena now has a nice new airport along with satellite space related comms:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Hel ... h_Stations

Image

What is interesting about the image above is that the 2014 source of the magnetic anomaly is exactly where the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) is, originally known as the Chagos Islands before Britain threw all the native inhabitants off to other islands then leased it to the USA to build...
In 1971, the United Kingdom and the United States signed a treaty, leasing the island of Diego Garcia to the US military for the purposes of building a large air and naval base on the island. The deal was important to the UK government, as the United States granted it a substantial discount on the purchase of Polaris nuclear missiles in return for the use of the islands as a base.[17] The strategic location of the island was also significant at the centre of the Indian Ocean, and to counter any Soviet threat in the region.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_I ... _Territory
There seems to be a pattern here - Remote island + military base + "nuclear" + magnetic anomaly = UFO base/pit stop.

Surely the reduction in magnetic field is also related to the solar minimum? If the sun isn't active then earth can take a break and lower deflector shields. What worries me is the "elite" and military fiddling with things they shouldn't be, magnetic or otherwise.

user737
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2018 7:39 pm
Location: Near Colorado Springs, CO

Re: Earth's Magnetic Field

Post by user737 » Tue May 26, 2020 4:18 pm

Small island, big mission – Ascension Island supports 45 SW
https://www.patrick.af.mil/News/Article ... rts-45-sw/
Published February 06, 2019

45 SW = 45th Space Wing, US Space Force (USSF) - previous US Air Force (USAF) now USSF
The Air Force isn’t the only organization on Ascension. The Royal Air Force is stationed on the island as well. Both the Air Force and the RAF work together on joint airfield operations.
Hand and Glove.
“Close to the equator in the Atlantic Ocean, we get a view of the sky that a lot of places don’t get,” said Bouffard. “We can keep an eye on orbits that you can’t see in other parts of the world.”
Being near the equator is good for launch and orbit raising purposes but does nothing for observation purposes. Most of the more secretive birds fly highly Polar orbits which have them over the poles. A satellite in Polar orbit passes over the equator at a different longitude for each orbital revolution. The view to any satellite in Polar orbit would be very low on the horizon from near the equator. This is cover or the reporter is personally unaware of the lack of veracity of this statement.
Infinite Rider on the Big Dogma

Post Reply