Milo Wolff's "Wave Structure of Matter"

Discussion concerning the first major re-evaluation of Dewey B. Larson's Reciprocal System of theory, updated to include counterspace (Etheric spaces), projective geometry, and the non-local aspects of time/space.
Post Reply
User avatar
bperet
Posts: 1501
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 1:43 am
Location: 7.5.3.84.70.24.606
Contact:

Milo Wolff's "Wave Structure of Matter"

Post by bperet »

Wave Structure of Matter (WSM)

Paper by Milo Wolff

Wolff's premise is that there is an underlying "ether" that is used as a medium to transmit waves. He calls this ether "space".

Manifestation occurs when outward waves meet inward waves, in a spherical, scalar fashion, to produce a standing wave:

Quote:
Outward wave = Fout = (1/r) F0 e(iwt - kr)

Inward wave = Fin = (1/r) F0 e(iwt + kr)
The 'outward wave' is Larson's progression of the natural reference system. The 'inward wave' is Larson's "direction reversal", both concepts being done from a non-local perspective. The result of this combination is a standing wave, namely a simple, harmonic motion, which parallels Larson's idea of the photon being the first manifestation.

From this, he does exactly the same thing Larson does, and rotates it, but not producting the rotational base, instead producing the electron and positron as the first "real" entity, the difference being the direction of spin (though he does not give a reference point for the measuring of direction):

Quote:
electron = Fin- Fout + CW spin

positron = Fout - Fin + CCW spin
He does consider the electrons and positrons to be "charged particles", and does not recognize the uncharged states of these particles. Thus, his resulting structure is a SHM (Fin - Fout) plus a "spin", which is the same structure used in RS2 whereas these particles (rotations) carry a charge (photon/SHM). So his wave equations do work for RS2, but not the RS, because they would be the properties of Larson's "rotational base", not electrons or positrons. Now if Larson was wrong about the "rotational equivalent of nothing", and they do have properties which are then translated and perceived within subatomic structure, then his wave equations may also apply to the RS.

Wolff does not accept the concepts of "time" or "motion", but I believe it is just a matter of semantics. In his WSM theory, space has two properties, standing waves (point particles) and communication (an ability for particles to communicate with each other). Translating his concepts into the Reciprocal System, we find:

Wolff (space) = Larson (motion) = ether

Wolff (standing wave) = Larson (space,local)

Wolff (communication) = Larson (time,non-local)

Past this point Wolff becomes set in using QM and SR/GR as a way to explain his ideas, and I was not really able to follow it. It is a shame because he had a good start, but then accepted the conclusions of legacy science as correct and tried to duplicate them, introducing the same conceptual errors in his system (like relativistic mass increase).

In brief summary, he derives his conclusions from a study of the electron, which in RS2 is a cosmic particle and hence non-local, appearing as a wavefunction in the local realm. As a result, he is presenting a non-local theory, whereas Larson presented a "local" theory -- two aspects of the same "theory of things".
Every dogma has its day...
Post Reply