Speed of the Progression of the Natural Reference System
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 10:07 am
fly apart at the speed of light. This was first published in Larson's 1959 book, The Structure of the Physical Universe.
Seems that the millions of conventional scientists only took 60 years to figure it out for themselves, except they are still trying to turn it into an aether--and still refuse to call it that, so now it is a "dark energy fluid" that acts in an "anti-gravity" fashion, trying to push everything in the universe apart at the speed of light.
See: https://phys.org/news/2018-12-universe- ... osmos.html
However, Larson only accounts for the linear speed of progression, as his only primary motion is a linear (yang) one. But in RS2, there are two primaries: linear and angular (yin) speeds, so there is also an angular speed of progression.
The Photon 2.0 research has shown that the photon IS NOT a "linear vibration" as claimed by Larson and conventional science, but a compound rotation that can be projected as a linear vibration. Science has built their theory of light on the projection, not the object casting the projection, so things like wave-particle dualities show up as the "shadow" changes. This does not occur with the quaternion photon model.
During that research, it appeared that there may have been a discrepancy between the speed of the progression and the speed of light, since ALL measurements of the speed of light are within the Earth's gravitational field--and it is a known fact that gravity deflects light by changing its speed. On my best estimate, the speed of the progression would have been the "center" of the visible spectrum, green/magenta, or 12 natural units of space from where Larson had put it. This means that the progression is moving 12x the speed of light.
This morning, Gopi sent me an email suggesting that, due to the photon being a quaternion of 4π radians, that science may have just "unrolled" that quaternion into a line... meaning that the speed of the progression was 4π faster than the speed of light (12.57× faster). This seems to make sense.
I was also considering that visible light, based on Larson's analysis (from Newton, not Goethe), shows visible light running from 8s to 16s (where "s" is a natural unit of space, expressing wavelength). In a quantized (discrete) system like the Reciprocal System, π=4, so 4π=16 (red) and 4π/2=2π=8 (blue) -- the visible spectrum, but only the Newtonian RGB half. So it may be that 0π to 2π (4π/2, the first half of the rotation) is Goethe's spectrum.
Also note that Hamilton's equation, i.j.k=-1 indicates that for unit motion in all rotational planes, the net motion is inward (-1) -- not the outward progression. Whereas linear progression starts with outward and uses rotation to create inward, angular progression does the opposite: starts with inward and uses linear progression to create an outward motion. As far as colors go, based on the Photon 2.0 model, it would start with -1 (black) and move towards +1 (white). However, since we exist in the "linear" progression with a datum of +1, we tend to view light from the +1 or white perspective--Newton's spectrum.
So what we have is two types of progression: linearly outward (yang) and angularly inward (yin). Both run at "unit" speed, 1s/1t linearly, or 2π/1t angularly.
But this raises an interesting question... is the speed of light the same for every color?
Seems that the millions of conventional scientists only took 60 years to figure it out for themselves, except they are still trying to turn it into an aether--and still refuse to call it that, so now it is a "dark energy fluid" that acts in an "anti-gravity" fashion, trying to push everything in the universe apart at the speed of light.
See: https://phys.org/news/2018-12-universe- ... osmos.html
However, Larson only accounts for the linear speed of progression, as his only primary motion is a linear (yang) one. But in RS2, there are two primaries: linear and angular (yin) speeds, so there is also an angular speed of progression.
The Photon 2.0 research has shown that the photon IS NOT a "linear vibration" as claimed by Larson and conventional science, but a compound rotation that can be projected as a linear vibration. Science has built their theory of light on the projection, not the object casting the projection, so things like wave-particle dualities show up as the "shadow" changes. This does not occur with the quaternion photon model.
During that research, it appeared that there may have been a discrepancy between the speed of the progression and the speed of light, since ALL measurements of the speed of light are within the Earth's gravitational field--and it is a known fact that gravity deflects light by changing its speed. On my best estimate, the speed of the progression would have been the "center" of the visible spectrum, green/magenta, or 12 natural units of space from where Larson had put it. This means that the progression is moving 12x the speed of light.
This morning, Gopi sent me an email suggesting that, due to the photon being a quaternion of 4π radians, that science may have just "unrolled" that quaternion into a line... meaning that the speed of the progression was 4π faster than the speed of light (12.57× faster). This seems to make sense.
I was also considering that visible light, based on Larson's analysis (from Newton, not Goethe), shows visible light running from 8s to 16s (where "s" is a natural unit of space, expressing wavelength). In a quantized (discrete) system like the Reciprocal System, π=4, so 4π=16 (red) and 4π/2=2π=8 (blue) -- the visible spectrum, but only the Newtonian RGB half. So it may be that 0π to 2π (4π/2, the first half of the rotation) is Goethe's spectrum.
Also note that Hamilton's equation, i.j.k=-1 indicates that for unit motion in all rotational planes, the net motion is inward (-1) -- not the outward progression. Whereas linear progression starts with outward and uses rotation to create inward, angular progression does the opposite: starts with inward and uses linear progression to create an outward motion. As far as colors go, based on the Photon 2.0 model, it would start with -1 (black) and move towards +1 (white). However, since we exist in the "linear" progression with a datum of +1, we tend to view light from the +1 or white perspective--Newton's spectrum.
So what we have is two types of progression: linearly outward (yang) and angularly inward (yin). Both run at "unit" speed, 1s/1t linearly, or 2π/1t angularly.
But this raises an interesting question... is the speed of light the same for every color?