The New Math

Discussion concerning the first major re-evaluation of Dewey B. Larson's Reciprocal System of theory, updated to include counterspace (Etheric spaces), projective geometry, and the non-local aspects of time/space.
Post Reply
Lou
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 5:25 pm

The New Math

Post by Lou »

What is the background to the math? Is it still the cartesian graph? This graph depicts an absolute, unmoving space. Any math using this as a reference frame is invalid.

After review of Miles Mathis papers I can only conclude that he is correc about two things. First, that physics is a mess because it has been highjacked by math. And the second is that the logarithmic function is falsely related to the calculus. But he still uses an absolute space to calculate his revised calculus.

If space moves, our math is useless. Space cannot be a reference frame and light speed cannot be used either because it is tied to space motion. The only reference pointfor motion is the focus of space, which is unmoving.
Post Reply