- Independent, like a microcosmic bubble of time, where all the temporal coordinates are just local to that micro-universe?
- Dependent upon locations and structures that exist within the 3D time of the cosmic sector, where unit space is a lens or window into the cosmic sector?
While trying to design the structures for computer code, one cannot help but notice the similarities between the coordinate time of the time region and the coordinate time of the cosmic sector--they both work the same way. No sense in creating two copies of computer functions that do precisely the same thing, so I started factoring out the commonalities, which gave rise to this question.
When you DO factor out the pieces, you find a yin-yang interpretation of the two aspects of motion:
- Yang: 1D, extension space or time
- Yin: 2D, equivalent space or time
For the conventional perspective of the material sector, we have "locations" in extension space (coordinates), where each location can contain outward motion in the time region (displacements manifest as photons, particles or atoms) that is expressed through equivalent space (rotationally inward motion in space). This results in spatial aggregates and physical structure. The cosmic sector is the inverse: extension time locations holding equivalent time structures--antimatter.
With this interpretation, what the program code comes down to is a choice: create an independent, micro-universe for each and every photon, particle and atom (which contains an infinite amount of time), or just place those temporal displacements at a unique, absolute location in the cosmic sector--one universe with distributed motion.
If the time region IS a "window" into the cosmic sector, then some interesting consequences arise:
- Spatial structure (the net displacements between atoms) may actually be the internal structure of a cosmic atom, since that window works both ways--the space region in the cosmic sector would be a window into the material sector. This may be the basis of Sacred Geometry, because by arranging things geometrically in space, you are actually altering atomic structure in time, resulting in nonlocal (energetic) consequences.
- Atoms would not be isolated from the rest of the universe and would be effected INTERNALLY by phenomena such as the microwave background radiation, neutrino background flux, gamma ray bursts and the like. The atomic structure would never be static; it would always be changing due to these influences. This may explain the intra-atomic energy (free energy) found by the 19th and early 20th century researchers like John W. Keely, Gustave LeBon, T. Henry Moray, Nikola Tesla and others. It would literally be "solar power" from INSIDE the atom.
- Material and cosmic atoms are not independent of each other, they are linked in a scalar fashion "each inside the other." That would indicate that the external spatial rotation (the C dimension, spinning the time region) would actually be the influence of the inverse structure, extension time, not an independent motion (unless there wasn't anything else around).
But, when you structure the Universe in a manner analogous to the situation Doctor Who (Jon Pertwee) encountered in "The Time Monster," landing his TARDIS inside the Master's TARDIS--to discover the Master's TARDIS also landed inside of his--you only need a single Universe with two aspects, existing as a scalar inversion... or should I say a "Reciprocal System."
I know the multiverse theory is quite popular--people love their parallel realities. But my tendency is towards #2, one universe with two aspects, each inside each other. As to why, well I've seen the effects of Sacred Geometry and Feng Shui on my own life and power coming out of "nowhere." This situation could readily explain those phenomenon, whereas the multiverse of mini-Universes could not, because all connection would be purely localized and mechanical.
I'd like to get some opinions, pro or con, before I delve further into the coding. Thanks.