Cosmic background radiation

[oreneorg]

In the analysis of the work on the cosmic background radiation , some contradictions appear :

The first would be that while the share of 2.7 ° K would be 57 GHz frequency , in much scientific literature wikipedia academic type or frequency of 160 GHz appears .

The second is that while in the case of iron which is the maximum stability of link:
http://www.scienceinschool.org/print/528

We approached the 2,725 ° K observed in the other elements that are less stable binding change locations to bigger errors:

http://reciprocalsystem.org/PDFa/Cosmic ... Nehru).pdf

Moreover destrucion the thermal limit of the elements :
http://reciprocalsystem.org/PDFa/Intrin ... Nehru).pdf

Is the order of 10 ^ 13, when the inverse of 2.7 ° K in Counterspace would correspond to 3.6 * 10 ^ 10 K , although it is true that in other literature as:
http://books.google.es/books?id=Klc_JmX ... os&f=false

the temperature of the supernova explosion is quoted as 7 * 10 ^ 10 K

[oreneorg]

It must have made an error related to the concept of billon 10 ^ 9 or 10 ^ 12 as temperatures in the range 10 ^ 13 citing Nehru at its thermal limit work items seems excessive.

Se debe haber cometido un error relacionado con el concepto de billon 10^9 o 10^12 ya que las temperaturas del orden de 10^13 que cita Nerhu en su trabajo de limite termico de los elementos parece excesivo.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_and_short_scales

http://reciprocalsystem.org/PDFa/Intrin ... Nehru).pdf

[bperet]

If I understand you correctly (Google translate is often confusing), Nehru's values for the natural unit of temperature are correct (10^12 K). I was unaware that "billion" had different values in different countries.

A natural unit of temperature is the maximum temperature that is expressed by a unit of motion (displacement of 1 unit of space). Thermal motion is outward in space. The "direction reversals" associated with the thermal motion are in time, with the effect of greatly reducing the natural unit of temperature, because (1 space / n time = lower temperature).

Larson indicates this backward relationship by using "1-x" (start at 1 natural unit, and slow down to 'x'). For speed, 1 is the speed of light and "x" are temporal displacements, resulting in a net speed slower than light. The same situation with temperatures; start at the maximum of 1 natural unit, then slow down as temporal displacement increases.

[oreneorg]

If you're right, the natural unit of temperature EST nat = 7.20423 x 10 12 K, is documented in various writings:

Si, tienes razón, la unidad natural de temperatura es T nat = 7.20423 x 10^12 ºK, esta documentado en diversos escritos:

https://www.google.es/search?q=T+nat+%3 ... 3&ie=UTF-8

Which gives, thermal limits of the order of 10 ^ 13 K, but in many web's, entered to see the explosion of supernovae, temperatures of about 10 ^ 11 K

Lo cual da limites termicos del orden de 10^13 ºK, pero en muchas web´s veo que ponen para la explosión de supernovas temperaturas del orden de 10^11 ºK ...

[oreneorg]

This range would be within the range of energies of cosmic rays, which would represent the temperatures reached in supernova explosions

[oreneorg]

Intrinsic Variables, Supernovae and the Thermal Limit ?

[oreneorg]

Dividing the gas constant by Avogadro’s number, 6.02486 x 10²³ per g-mole, we obtain theBolzman constant, the corresponding value on a single molecule basis: 1.38044 x 10^-16ergs/deg. As indicated earlier, this is two-thirds of the natural unit, and the natural unit of specific heat is therefore 2.07066 x 10^-16 ergs/deg. We then divide unit energy, 1.49175 x 10^-3 ergs, by this unit of specific heat, which gives us 7.20423 x 10¹² degrees Kelvin, the natural unit of temperature in the region outside unit distance (that is, for the gaseous state of matter).

http://www.reciprocalsystem.com/bpm/bpm05.htm

[oreneorg]

http://edition.cnn.com/2014/02/19/tech/ ... n-science/

(CNN) -- Cassiopeia A was a star more than eight times the mass of our sun before it exploded in the cataclysmic, fiery death astronomers call a supernova.

And thanks to NASA space telescopes, scientists are learning more than ever about exactly how it happened.

The NuSTAR space telescope array is the first to map the radioactive material from a supernova explosion. The results were published Wednesday in the journal Nature.

"Until we had NuSTAR, we couldn't see down to the core of the explosion," Brian Grefenstette, lead author and research scientist at the California Institute of Technology, said at a news conference Wednesday.

.................

[oreneorg]

An attempt correction to the deduction limit on thermal

[oreneorg]

I rectified