Dimensional Speed Ranges

Discussion concerning the first major re-evaluation of Dewey B. Larson's Reciprocal System of theory, updated to include counterspace (Etheric spaces), projective geometry, and the non-local aspects of time/space.
Post Reply
User avatar
bperet
Posts: 1501
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 1:43 am
Location: 7.5.3.84.70.24.606
Contact:

Dimensional Speed Ranges

Post by bperet »

As discussed in the topic on Permittivity and Permeability, the 1D electric and 2D magnetic relations appear to be reciprocals of each other and not two, separate phenomenon. I have been thinking about the issue of why there is a dimensional difference, and based on the (1 s/t)3 unit datum, the answer is that we should be measuring from that unit datum, down, not up from zero. The dimensional sequence should be 3-x, 2-x, 1-x, which is identical to Larson's concept of speed ranges, used mainly with his work in astronomy.

Larson applies the speed range concept to the macrocosm to explain white dwarfs, pulsars, quasars and other stellar phenomenon. Due to the reciprocal relation between space and time, and therefore the reciprocal relation between macrocosm and microcosm, these three, speed ranges must also exist inside the unit boundary--in the time region.

The misunderstanding was that the unit boundary was 10, a dimensionless "absolute location" in the spatial grid. As discussed elsewhere, zero and infinity are not locations, but boundaries (other datums of measurement). When we start from the correct unit boundary, 13, and move through equivalent space towards the zero boundary (or through time to the infinity boundary), we must also encounter the remaining two, discrete dimensional boundaries of 12 and 11, which act as the transition points of "equivalent space" speed ranges. With speed ranges outside the unit boundary explaining astronomical phenomenon in the macrocosm, and speed ranges inside the unit boundary explaining atomic fields, we have a perfectly symmetrical, reciprocal system, as it should be.

One thing that must be remembered when dealing with a unit boundary, is that the directions of inward and outward are with respect to that boundary--not zero. Outward from the unit space boundary that delimits the time region, means outward from that boundary. When two atoms are outside the unit boundaries of each other, the outward motion acts to push them apart (progression of the natural reference system) and prevent the formation of a molecule. In RS2, we would say this motion is yang, pushing linearly outward. However, when those same, two atoms are inside the unit boundaries of each other, then that SAME outward motion, moving out from the boundary towards infinite time (zero in equivalent space), it acts as a force of attraction, preventing those same atoms from coming apart, keeping them stuck together AS a molecule. This is the RS2 yin, pushing rotationally inward.

The three speed ranges present inside the unit boundary will have similar effects, in essence being reflective around the unit boundary--there will be 3 speed ranges manifest in space surrounding the unit boundary, and three speed ranges manifest in time, inside the unit boundary.

The three speed ranges going outward from the unit boundary, into the macrocosm:
  • 3-x: the dimensional, unit boundary, gravitation (the closest and therefore "weakest" force).
  • 2-x: the magnetic field boundary.
  • 1-x: the electric field boundary (the strongest force).
The three speed ranges going outward from the unit boundary, into the "time region" microcosm:
  • 3-x: the perceived "mass" of the atom.
  • 2-x: Nehru's atomic zone, the magnetic rotations of the system.
  • 1-x: Nehru's nuclear zone, the electric rotations of the system.
As you can see, magnetic rotations inside are at the same speed as the magnetic field outside; electric rotation inside is in the same speed range as the external electric field, as are gravity and mass--"reflections" of each other, as Lou put it in the other discussions. All of them are just "motions," with the difference being the speed range in which they are measured, analogous driving a car down the road and shifting gears. The engine RPM repeats for each gear, but the net, observed speed is vastly different for that RPM. This also explains why Larson states that 8 units of electric displacement can be converted to 1 unit of magnetic displacement--the electric motion reached the maximum speed for 1st gear, and shifted to 2nd, with a corresponding drop in RPM to maintain the same, net speed. It just crossed the dimensional boundary.

There is a difference between an electric displacement and an electron: The electron is an electric displacement within a space region, a particle. The electric displacement is a property of the particle or atom. When considering the atom as an LC circuit, one must remember that the dimensional boundary between the electric and magnetic zones is away or toward that boundary--electric and magnetic displacements will therefore appear to be the reciprocals of each other (+i versus -1/i, on the imaginary axis), around that boundary. The atom will have an internal resonance at this LC frequency. But, the atom can also capture electrons within its temporal structure, and those electrons will not affect the displacement in the nuclear zone, but WILL alter the external, electric field by adding their electric field to that speed. There is also an external LC frequency that we use in tuned circuits, that is independent of the atomic structure, but dependent upon voltage and current (the presence of charged and uncharged electrons in the atoms).
Every dogma has its day...
Post Reply