Counterspace Infinity and the Time Region

Discussion concerning the first major re-evaluation of Dewey B. Larson's Reciprocal System of theory, updated to include counterspace (Etheric spaces), projective geometry, and the non-local aspects of time/space.
Post Reply
User avatar
bperet
Posts: 1501
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 1:43 am
Location: 7.5.3.84.70.24.606
Contact:

Counterspace Infinity and the Time Region

Post by bperet »

I was reading Nick Thomas' book, Science Between Space and Counterspace, and he made an interesting point about the concept of strain arising from the interaction of two, counterspace infinities, where the geometric interaction could result in a stress, creating a physical force that would cause either a deformation of an object, or cause them to move apart or attract. From this, he derives a concept of the nature of gravitation.

Thinking in RS terms, the sequence of steps in the Time Region, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/n... indicate that, if you consider the unit space boundary to be a sphere, the center is at an infinite temporal speed... at a point at infinity--a counterspace infinity--exactly what Thomas was describing.

Additionally, it occurred to me that, using homogeneous coordinates, the plane at infinity actually contains an infinite number of "points at infinity", denoted by [ x y z 0 ] -- they are all unique "infinities".

Suppose the center of the time region, where t=infinite, is one of the points on that plane at infinity. Each time region could then have its own "point at infinity", and as such, a strain will arise between them, causing a repulsive force (stress) between spatial locations, causing the locations to move apart in a scalar fashion--the progression.

There is also the possibility that the points at infinity of two or more time regions COINCIDE... sharing the same "infinity", which means no strain and no force trying to separate--unless you try to separate those points, in which case an ATTRACTIVE stress is produced. This is EXACTLY the state that Larson describes for chemical bonding and the stability of molecules! Atoms by themselves, different CSI (CounterSpace Infinity). Molecules, same CSI.

Taking it one step further... the plane at infinity is treated as any other plane in geometry, so it can also have a collection of points--an area--which are related. Move the area, and all the time regions associated with it move as well but are not chemically bonded, since they share an area, not the same point. In other words--an aggregate structure, like a rock. The total area would be the net, temporal displacement of all the component parts--its "mass", and the dual of that area--a point--would be a spatial point at the center of gravity. This may explain WHY mass can be represented as a single point of net, aggregate mass.

Found it to be quite an interesting thought, considering the application--rather than fuse elements by spatial force, one could just align the "vanishing points"--the counterspace infinity--to the same location on the plane at infinity, and the atoms would "cold" fuse with virtually no energy.
Every dogma has its day...
Post Reply