Boson and fermion spin

Discussion concerning the first major re-evaluation of Dewey B. Larson's Reciprocal System of theory, updated to include counterspace (Etheric spaces), projective geometry, and the non-local aspects of time/space.
Post Reply
User avatar
bperet
Posts: 1501
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 1:43 am
Location: 7.5.3.84.70.24.606
Contact:

Boson and fermion spin

Post by bperet »

Sarada Kesiraju wrote:

Quote:
Hello sir,

How does the difference between the intrinsic spins of Bosons and Fermions come about in our RS2?
In RS2, the time region is polar and operates inversely to the space-time region. In the outside region, and in Larson's atomic model which is based on "outside", Euclidean rules, the building sequence starts with nothing (rotational base), then builds to 1-dimensional electric, then 2-dimensional magnetic.

With RS2, the situation is the polar inverse. The time region building process starts with "everything" rotating, a 3-dimensional rotational base (equivalent to nothing), then builds down to a 2-dimensional magnetic rotation (primary motion), then a 1-dimensional electric rotation (secondary motion). All the primary rotations are thus "magnetic" in nature, which Nehru identified as a "solid rotation" with a half-integer spin (fermions, like positrons and electrons). Secondary motions arise from the interaction of 2 primary motions, and are integer-spin (bosons, like the photon: 1/2 + 1/2 = 1). All the primary motions within the time region in RS2 are therefore seen as fermions.

Composite structures, like the proton, neutron and atoms, would follow a general rule where an aggregate of an even number of rotations would be a boson, and an odd number would be a fermion.

You might find Larson's paper, "The Density Gradient in White Dwarf stars" of some use, because it explains this type of inverse behavior in stars, due to motion in time.

Bruce
Every dogma has its day...
Post Reply