## Electric and magnetic fields in RS

This forum is dedicated to the student just starting out with the concepts of the Reciprocal System, or RS2. Questions and clarifications for the RS/RS2 concepts go here; please place new ideas and commentary in the appropriate RS2 fora.
rossum
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:36 am

### Electric and magnetic fields in RS

Dear all,

I am a bit confused from the electric and magnetic charges and fields as used in RS, so I would appreciate if someone could help me by understanding it. My confusion results from the following:

In the book Structure of the physical universe Larson introduces the concept of magnetic charge and magnetic potential M. The magnetic potential he uses is probably different from magnetic vector potential commonly denoted as A. He explicitly mentions that the gradient of the magnetic potential is the magnetic field intensity (chapter XXIX). Later he makes it clear that that by magnetic field intensity (which is unfortunately in english a bit confusing because of it's usage for two distinct fields - in terms of mathematical fields) he termed magnetic induction commonly denoted as B. However

∇×B = j+dD/dt

Which is often a non-zero expression. From this would follow that ∇×(∇M) is not equal 0 - that is mathematically impossible...

Further more (and more importantly) he explicitly shows the dimensions of the electric charge q as t.s-1 and the dimensions of the magnetic flux φ as t2.s-2. However the product of the two qφ should have the dimensions of action [coulomb× weber]=[joule×seconds] which in reciprocal system is t2.s-1 whereas if we multiply their dimensions we get the dimensions of mass t-3s-3.

If you can clarify this please go into detail as much as you can.

Thank you very much.

Jan

bperet
Posts: 1480
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 1:43 am
Location: 7.5.3.84.70.24.606
Contact:

### Electromagnetism

Larson did not get the concept of charge quite right due to the way he assigned units to capacitance. See pages 169-170 (Electrical Storage) of Basic Properties of Matter, where he discusses the difference between charge as energy (Q=t/s) and charge as electric quantity (q=s). Also see Table 30 on page 218 and Chapter 20 for what he updated since writing Structure of the Physical Universe. (Click on BPOM title for a PDF of the book, available for free on http://reciprocalsystem.org )
Further more (and more importantly) he explicitly shows the dimensions of the electric charge q as t.s-1 and the dimensions of the magnetic flux φ as t2.s-2. However the product of the two qφ should have the dimensions of action [coulomb× weber]=[joule×seconds] which in reciprocal system is t2.s-1 whereas if we multiply their dimensions we get the dimensions of mass t-3s-3.
This is addressed in BPOM, because "charge" here is the "quantity of charge" which has units of space (s), not energy (t/s). So the equation becomes s x t2/s2 = t2/s, units of action.

I did not understand why ∇×(∇M) must be equal to zero. Can you clarify?
Every dogma has its day...

rossum
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:36 am