Keely's Law of Sympathetic Attraction

Discussion concerning other (non-RS) systems of theory and the insights obtained from them, as applied to the developing RS2 theory.
Post Reply
User avatar
bperet
Posts: 1501
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 1:43 am
Location: 7.5.3.84.70.24.606
Contact:

Keely's Law of Sympathetic Attraction

Post by bperet »

There are strong similarities between the work of John Worrell Keely and the "yin" aspect of RS2. The basis of Keely's work comes from his Law of Sympathetic Attraction, which is what keeps things together.

I'm reading the book, Keely and His Discoveres, written by Mrs. Clara Jessup Bloomfield Moore, which is basically comments and log entries made by Keely over the course of his work on his motor. Found this interesting, remembering this is 1885 and there aren't any digital watches...

"It has been found that, in a watchmaker's shop, the timepieces, or clocks, connected with the same wall or shelf, have such a sympathetic effect in keeping time, that they stop those which beat in irregular time; and, if any are at rest, set those going which beat accurately."
He then speaks of light, and says that absorption of light by matter is sympathetic attraction. This is interesting, because it gives a clue to what he is talking about, and how it can be interepreted in terms of the Reciprocal System. In the RS, we know that light absorbs, reflects and refacts, though Larson never went into any details as to how. Nehru did with some of his birotation material, showing how the aspects of birotation can be altered by passing through a magnetic field (atoms are magnets--the Zeeman effect).

When light is absorbed by an atom, it has to be "stored" somewhere, as motion cannot be created or destroyed, only changed. The only things I can think of is it is stored as either heat or charge.

Charge would have a limit on how many photons could be captured, as from what I've experimented with so far, only the electron can capture an LF photon (light, radio, etc), since the photon displacement is in space and the electron displacement is in space, and space/space is not motion. But the electron has only a single unit of displacement, so it could only capture a single photon (becoming a charged electron in RS2). Neutrinos could then capture that electron, building atomic isotope. So absorption by charge would be dependent upon the number of electron motions present in a compound rotating system, basically the "orbital electrons" of conventional theory.

Electron capture would not be frequency dependent, as it's just fly paper--the photon gets stuck there because of the removal of free dimensions and the space/space relationship.

Heat could store quite a number of photons, as things can get pretty hot. All that is required is to change the orientation of the photon vibration, such that it is in the same direction as the progression. That seems quite feasible, given Nehru's research on birotation.

Heat capture WOULD be frequency dependent, as the atomic motion would have to be outward in time at the same speed as the photon motion would have to be outward in space, resulting in no net motion between the two. It also means that if the speeds are not matched, the net speed will be altered as the photon passes through the atom (basically slowed down, due to the extra time of the atom) and then "re-emitted" along a different path (continuing on, carried by the progression). An analogy would be the "bending" of light that passes close to the sun, from distant stars--a well-known phenomenon.

This may be the basis of Keely's sympathetic attraction--the matching of speeds in inverse aspects.
Every dogma has its day...
Post Reply