Aetherometry

Discussion concerning other (non-RS) systems of theory and the insights obtained from them, as applied to the developing RS2 theory.
Post Reply
davelook
Posts: 85
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:50 pm

Aetherometry

Post by davelook »

The Making of the Difference:

A review of Dr. Paulo and Alexandra Correa's Experimental Aetherometry

From http://aetherometry.com/bookstore/ExpAe ... kanas.html...

"By contrast, the 'basic science project' of a Physics of Energy is very much alive, and thriving, in the research of the Correas. "Experimental Aetherometry" unfolds before its reader a scientific perspective which takes energy as its most primary concept, which regards every presence of a force as a manifestation of some form of energy, and in which Space and Time themselves are exact functions of energy. The Correas succeed in systematically laying out the microfunctional structure common to all energy forms, as well as the specific microfunctions composing each distinct form of energy. A physico-mathematical foundation is thus created for an in-depth understanding of the processes of interconversion which form the basis of the Law of Conservation of Energy.

Fundamental to the Correas' scientific approach is the view that nature composes with only two basic functions: wavelength and frequency. All other measures conceptualized by physics (or, more precisely, those measures that have a reality, i.e. a basis in nature) - for example, mass, charge, voltage, capacitance, resistance, temperature, magnetic flux density - are, functionally speaking, compositions of lengths and frequencies, i.e. units of Space and Time. Aetherometry shows mass to be functionally equivalent to length, force to a superposition of waves, charge to linear momentum, voltage to speed. This pursuit of the correct natural qualities for the parameters used for the quantitative exploration and description of nature is characteristic of the all-pervading microfunctionalism underlying the aetherometric science."
Post Reply