Search found 70 matches

by Sun
Thu Apr 05, 2018 7:59 am
Forum: Life Unit Biology
Topic: Relationship between the Five Organs, Trigrams and states of matter
Replies: 11
Views: 44368

Re: Relationship between the Five Organs, Trigrams and states of matter

Consider mercury in the overcoming sequency(used by alchemy), a cosmic fire state, with gold next to it, overcoming cosmic metal state which is a solid state in material, only one state distance from gold, the perfect condidate for alchemy. It is very possible that altering the state of matter by vi...
by Sun
Thu Apr 05, 2018 1:28 am
Forum: Life Unit Biology
Topic: Relationship between the Five Organs, Trigrams and states of matter
Replies: 11
Views: 44368

Relationship between the Five Organs, Trigrams and states of matter

I've been working on a Five Organs model for a while, following a clue by Bruce in the Wu Xing topic on Antiquatis. I was planning to start a "five organs topic" when i finish a RS model(still a lot to learn), but i find something very interesting. The TCM academy recognize ☵ as an abstrac...
by Sun
Tue Mar 27, 2018 9:43 am
Forum: RS2-0: Getting Started with the Reciprocal System
Topic: Time measurement problem
Replies: 7
Views: 31653

Re: Time measurement problem

Thank you Bruce. Have you find a way to solve the "charge problem"? Like Searl or The charging method Thomas Trawöger uses to charge the "generator" in his pyramid system (using RF energy to cause crystal alignment in quartz sand) You had done something similar years ago, an expl...
by Sun
Mon Mar 26, 2018 8:30 am
Forum: RS2-0: Getting Started with the Reciprocal System
Topic: Time measurement problem
Replies: 7
Views: 31653

Re: Time measurement problem

Let the measured time be t', and natural time be t, assuming a motion with s/t ratio change one unit of t' into s/t unit of t, t'=2t for uncharged electron 2/1 for instance. But the measured s/t' ratio will change with t', so the relation between t' and t is not a constant. The function of s(t') , t...
by Sun
Sun Mar 25, 2018 11:40 am
Forum: RS2-0: Getting Started with the Reciprocal System
Topic: Time measurement problem
Replies: 7
Views: 31653

Time measurement problem

s +1 -1 +1 - -- -- -- t +1 +1 +1 Above is the concept of Larson's direction reversal, but i'm always wondering why it is not Δ s/t +1 -1 +1 (or 2/1 1/2 2/1) -- -- -- +1 +1 +1 progression s/t The result of direction reversal is no more than a 1D 2/1 1/2 displacement periodically. Suppose we live in ...
by Sun
Mon Mar 19, 2018 11:13 pm
Forum: RS2-0: Getting Started with the Reciprocal System
Topic: RS2 Tutorial Book
Replies: 33
Views: 107388

Re: RS2 Tutorial Book

Just mentioning RS theory will cause immediate rejection in the scientific community--that has been the case for over 50 years now. It's normal that they reject RS. In fact they reject any theory that doesn't fit the conventional model. The modern medical system is based on a chemical/molecular mod...
by Sun
Mon Mar 19, 2018 2:54 am
Forum: RS2-0: Getting Started with the Reciprocal System
Topic: RS2 Tutorial Book
Replies: 33
Views: 107388

Re: RS2 Tutorial Book

It turns out that Sun's comments on dimensional splitting (1D vs 3D) became a kind of Rosetta Stone for RS2... So glad to hear that. I would suggest do not make this book Science Fiction style, because it might be quoted by a lot of academic papers in the future. RS is good enough to be comprehensi...
by Sun
Mon Mar 12, 2018 10:24 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Why scalar motions do not need to come in pairs?
Replies: 10
Views: 19786

Re: Why scalar motions do not need to come in pairs?

Very interesting! Sounds more like spliting aether. What about a 3D-3D split, like Atom/3D expansion pair for instance?
by Sun
Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:49 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Why scalar motions do not need to come in pairs?
Replies: 10
Views: 19786

Re: Why scalar motions do not need to come in pairs?

It is a matter of perspective Yes, the structure of motion depends on your perspective. No difference between 1D and (n-1)D. What is not changed is the space/time ratio. But what we identify as a physical object is the effect of a motion, not a motion itself that deviated from unity i suspect. Moti...
by Sun
Sat Mar 10, 2018 8:35 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Why scalar motions do not need to come in pairs?
Replies: 10
Views: 19786

Why scalar motions do not need to come in pairs?

2 0 = progression = real number <R> 2 1 = electric = complex number <R, iX> 2 2 = magnetic = quaternion <R, iX, jY, kZ> (real + 3D vector) 2 3 = life unit = octonion <R, e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, e6, e7> (real + 7D vector) But dimension is meaningless when applies to unit motion, because 1 1 =1 2 =1 3 =2 ...