Reciprocal System Research Society

If only Larson and Xavior Borg were collaborators! Imagine what they could accomplish together! Larson postulated the fundamental relation between space and time that defines an entirely new cosmology, while Borg untangled the historical units of physical measurement that have confused the work of t...

The shift in the scientific paradigm, from a system of theory, which posits matter in a framework of space and time, and seeks to reduce it to the fewest number of interactions between the fewest number of particles, to a system of theory, which posits nothing but motion, in three dimensions, existi...

This guy actually worked with Mills as a youngster, and has published a well written book on the whole thing:

http://www.brettholverstott.com/annouce ... -12th-talk

The difference between the set of fractions of the number 1, and the set of inverse rationals, is found in the datum of the number system. We can see it in two ways: One way to see it is from the standpoint of displacement, we might say. There is zero displacement between the numerator and denominat...

In the previous post, I discussed somewhat how the success of Randell Mills GUT (grand unified theory) is iconoclastic to the LST community's cherished notions of quantum mechanics. He regards QM as a purely mathematical solution to the problem of the electron in the Hydrogen atom, a solution with n...

Of the three extant RST-based theories (RSts), only one, the LRC RSt, follows the LST's standard model (sm) of particle physics to any degree. The reason is not because the sm is based on empirical observations, although it is, but because it emerged as consequences of the basic postulates of the RS...

Bruce wrote: ...the inverse of magnetic rotation IS momentum and we get our concept of "mass" from the magnetic rotation of atoms. It is true that when t/s motion in time is non-linear (i.e. a rotation), then t²/s², or rotation in two dimensions, would constitute magnetic rotation (or an a...

Bruce wrote: So E = hf works just fine (t/s = t2/s × 1/t), as it is just the angular form of E = ρv. That's true, it's just E = h x c/λ, but the idea of velocity (s/t) per unit space (s), when expressed as 1/t, or frequency, hides the parallel between E = mc 2 and E = hv, as far as dimensions with p...

Given that Randell Mills is proving that there is a reciprocal sector of the physical universe (although unbeknownst to him), it behooves the RST community to understand his work, inasmuch as it is the first venture of the LST community into the reciprocal sector, the sector of the universe we call ...

As students of the RST know, the most salient feature of Larson's new system of physical theory is that it divides the universe into two, reciprocal, sectors; the low-speed sector, called the material sector, and the high-speed sector, called the cosmic sector. The high-speed sector, which is a real...