Reciprocal System Research Society

Horace wrote: Now I am still stuggling to grasp the 3 masses problem, as I cannot understand the mechanism of how a 3rd atom influences the relative spatial aspects of motion of 2 other atoms, especially what happens to their temporal aspects of motion while they are far apart in space. The 3rd ato...

MWells wrote: Bruce can speak for himself, but I don't think he concluded this. Geometry is like a reference system in that it provides a framework or premise for the interpretation of motion. The idea of assuming or postulating particular geometries for the universe is a perfectly reasonable scien...

Horace wrote: In fact there are no logical reasons to make that assumptions (just because we cannot observe directional temporal variations does not mean they are not there). The "directional normalization" I depicted makes this assumption in order to cater to the common concept of a time...

Sarada Kesiraju wrote: Quote: Hello sir, How does the difference between the intrinsic spins of Bosons and Fermions come about in our RS2? In RS2, the time region is polar and operates inversely to the space-time region. In the outside region, and in Larson's atomic model which is based on "out...

When compared to the Reciprocal System, legacy science has a tendency to get things backwards. Good examples of this are the stellar evolutionary sequence, galactic evolutionary sequence, and the combustion process of stars (fusion versus age limit fission). What if quantum numbers were also “backwa...

Horace wrote: What about direction being normalized to a straight time line too? That is the function of the "absolute conic" in Projective Geometry where independent dimensions, each with their own scale, are brought into relation with each other (moving from affine to metric) using both...

Horace wrote:

... but the collision of M0 and M1 is postponed when M2 is near, so it is not just a matter of distorted observation...

Don't forget that 'motion' is what is being normalized to unit scale, distance AND clock time.

Horace wrote: Your explanation is nice and dandy until I consider the empirical "3 body problem" shown below. The simple explanation is that it is all an illusion, created by the way our senses perceive a Euclidean universe. What you are looking at is the transition point between scalar m...

Sarada wrote: How do you explain positive ionisation? In RS theory, positive ionization would be the presence of additional uncharged electrons. Being a space displacement, they appear as positive* "charges" (see "Basic Properties of Matter, page 151). Since physics does not recogniz...

<r>(Here is my reply to Nehru's email).<br/> <br/> Hello Nehru,<br/> <br/> I'll take a look at Maurice's stuff again. I have been working with atomic energy levels over the last week, but am still in the middle of analysis. One thing I did discover is that the "time region" has two "halves", as you ...