Reciprocal System Research Society

Bruce wrote: In space, we end up with a line segment showing a speed displacement. In counterspace, we end up with a WAVE showing one of two speed displacements, which we customarily represent as -sin(a) or +sin(a). Would this mean that the absolute locations in space appear discrete, while the abs...

Wouldn't a radioactive antenna skin make it easier for the charged electrons to shed the photons?

Another question that begs an answer is "Why does the frequency of the released photons mirror the frequency of the RF electric current?"

Bruce,

I am an accomplished low level programer (I am disgusted by the new bloated languages like Java), however the 3D graphics transforms do not help me in understanding moving reference systems even one bit.

Horace

I bet that circular crest's diameter is SNAT.
This nicely illustrates the geometry inversion at the unit boundary.

The rest of the article on the inner structure of the photon is at:
http://focus.aps.org/story/v8/st7#author

Bruce wrote: Atoms can gravitate together to form molecules. They usually do this because there is some net speed (valence) that causes them to keep moving in space, Can you elaborate what net speed? What is continously "redetermined" : Their direction in space or their direction in time?...

Horace wrote: The superposition in time region is more likely to happen when the masses are close to each other, due to the probabilistic distribution of their motions. This is the origin of the inverse square law. Although I know it is correct, I have a hard time justifying my own statement. I rem...

MWells wrote: Can you convert your idea of "pressure" to something like scalar potential where the concept of force exists? I wouldn't call it a pressure but I think I understand what Bruce means: I envision two racing cars. If the time is slowed down for one of these cars, then the car w...

Bruce, I'm glad you did not sweep the 3-body problem under the carpet. Bruce wrote: But remember that all atomic motion is in TIME, the time region. Am I correct in understanding that the motions of two gravitationally interacting objects actually come in contact (and interfere) in the time region, ...

All of this is a good explanation why the high frequency photons appear almost identical to the low frequency photons, despite that according to classical RST the reversals happen in time for the former and in space for the latter.

<t>Another way to look at it is that in/in is equvalent to out/out. A doughboy trapped in an in/in unit could not tell the difference if it was trapped in an out/out unit. It's just a different datum.<br/> <br/> Of course flipping the datum also flips all the other "ins" into "outs", and vice versa....