Reciprocal System Research Society

davelook wrote:

h-bar * c = 3.161526205E-026

sqrt 10 = 3.16227766

What is the significance?

<t>But there are no other "subclasses". Why emphasize them as belonging to a set of two? Space and time are a duality ("motion"). There really is only one primary reference system which is also a duality ("mind"). It is impossible for the reasoning process to entertain the two qualities of space and...

Quote: But one other problem creeps up... counterspace is polar, hence ANGLES, not linear translations, are PRIMARY. Space and time have the same properties by definition. Counterspace and space are the same thing. Therefore a linear translation and angular rotation ("turn") must be equiva...

Bruce wrote: The mathematics of Larson's RS is virtually identical to current theories, with the only problem being the conversion of Larson's "natural units" to conventional ones. But there is not just a unit-conversion problem. There are dimensional conversion problems, and problems map...

Hi Ross, Quote: Has Larson made any *new* predictions using his theory? ( I understand he's done at least one, predicting a new form or behavior of quasars, but I haven't read "Quasars and Pulsars" yet). Here are a few off the top of my head: Electrons travel through the atoms of a conduct...

Larson wrote: The rotating photon, on the other hand is continually moving from one absolute location to another as it travels back along the line of the progression of the natural reference system, and each time it enters a new absolute location the vectorial direction is redetermined by the chanc...

Yes, his general meaning is understood. The force concept arises out of a deep-seated need for a causal explanation of physical interactions. It's like a trap. The causal models are psychological and forms of reductionism. Larson was not immune to this trap either. In his version of scalar motion, s...

bperet wrote: When another mass is introduced, it brings with it its own pressure zone, increasing the temporal pressure (NOT spatial) between the spatial locations, pushing the objects apart in time, which is equivalent to pulling them together in space. When a 3rd, 4th or more mass is introduced ...

<t>Just as with the concept of the reciprocal relationship of physical space and time, there are basically two basic, reciprocal, mind-level concepts of differentiation and integration that we use to interpret what is observed at the physical level.<br/> <br/> Differentiation is done linearly, that ...

Fundamentally, "space" is a quality associated with a linear form of cognitive translation, when applied to interpreting the differentiated aspect of something. Consider an emergent framework for interpretation, where there is a developmental process underway. Very simply, the treatment of...