Search found 191 matches

by dbundy
Tue Oct 16, 2018 9:56 pm
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Meeting a Terrific Challenge
Replies: 113
Views: 651251

Re: Meeting a Terrific Challenge

Horace wrote: For the sake of others participating in this thread, first let's clarify your vernacular used during the consideration of only one dimension of one unit of scalar motion, in non-vectorial system: Q1) How many "directions" can this unit assume and how do you name them? Q2) How...
by dbundy
Tue Oct 16, 2018 12:38 pm
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Meeting a Terrific Challenge
Replies: 113
Views: 651251

Re: Meeting a Terrific Challenge

Hi Horace! Good to hear from you again. You wrote: IMO before considering multiple dimensions of motion, it is even more critical to understand, that one dimension of a unit of motion does not posses an intrinsic "direction", even if it can assume two possible "directions". The c...
by dbundy
Sun Oct 14, 2018 5:35 am
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Meeting a Terrific Challenge
Replies: 113
Views: 651251

Re: Meeting a Terrific Challenge

I think daniel's comment on the logic of the LRC's scalar number system is important, because it shows a need to understand Larson's cube (the 2x2x2 = 8 stack of 1-unit cubes), as fundamental. I explained it, with graphic illustrations, in the Introduction topic, but it's good to review it for those...
by dbundy
Sat Oct 13, 2018 11:13 pm
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Meeting a Terrific Challenge
Replies: 113
Views: 651251

Re: Meeting a Terrific Challenge

Daniel wrote: I have read every book and paper published on the Reciprocal System and nowhere in them do I find a "Larson cube," outside of your posts. The ONLY reference Larson made with a cube was to clarify that in a 3-dimensional system, there were EIGHT possible directions, not SIX as...
by dbundy
Sat Oct 13, 2018 6:20 pm
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Meeting a Terrific Challenge
Replies: 113
Views: 651251

Re: Meeting a Terrific Challenge

Hey daniel,

Thank you so much for your comment! I really appreciate that and I am anxious to respond to each of the points you have addressed. Unfortunately, I'm headed out to the movies in a few minutes, but if I get back in time, I'll take a shot at answering your great comment. Thanks again.
by dbundy
Fri Oct 05, 2018 5:45 am
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Meeting a Terrific Challenge
Replies: 113
Views: 651251

Re: Meeting a Terrific Challenge

Sorry, I didn't realize the link to Cohl Furey above, the LST physicist working to do particle physics using 3d octonions, was broken. I've fixed it and will repeat it here for the convenience of those interested in reading the article: Cohl Furey . While I'm at it, though, I would like to repeat so...
by dbundy
Wed Oct 03, 2018 2:29 pm
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Meeting a Terrific Challenge
Replies: 113
Views: 651251

Re: Meeting a Terrific Challenge

Thanks daniel. I'm looking into it.
by dbundy
Sat Sep 29, 2018 8:59 pm
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Meeting a Terrific Challenge
Replies: 113
Views: 651251

Re: Meeting a Terrific Challenge

I'm making no progress on the mass issue. It's very difficult problem, but in the meantime, blaine posted a comment on division algebras, in the General Discussion area, and I tried to argue that since those algebras are vector based, they are not suitable for scalar motion based research. My argume...
by dbundy
Sat Sep 29, 2018 4:53 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Division Algebras and Motion
Replies: 5
Views: 11092

Re: Division Algebras and Motion

One of the major advantages of the new multi-dimensional division algebra (i.e. scalar) over the traditional multi-dimensional division algebra (i.e. vector) is that the dimensions can be seen as an integrated whole; that is to say, if we begin with three non-zero dimensions and reduce them to 1, ra...
by dbundy
Fri Sep 28, 2018 7:26 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Division Algebras and Motion
Replies: 5
Views: 11092

Re: Division Algebras and Motion

I'd like to make further comparisons of multi-dimensional division algebra and multi-dimensional scalar algebra, if I may. The Euclidean "norm," as used in the term "normed division algebras," simply refers to a magnitude, or length, of a vector. It's most usefully thought of in ...