Search found 41 matches
- Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:20 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: more on gravitational waves?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 20795
a lie vs. truth
Well these guys are lying good enough to get big bucks to make LIGO even more sensitive [accurate?]. Seems there is something they are measuring. Any idea what that might be instead of GW?
- Tue Jul 12, 2016 4:01 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: more on gravitational waves?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 20795
more LIGO proof
Looks like second and maybe third find of GW by LIGO. Does this mean RS needs some changes? How do you account for it if not?
- Wed Jun 15, 2016 2:22 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: more on gravitational waves?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 20795
new today on SCIAM
No black holes? No GV waves? Hmmm ... these guys think so and now they have more "proof"?
Gravitational Wave Observatory Finds More Colliding Black Holes
The second confirmation of ripples in spacetime is announced by astronomers at LIGO
Gravitational Wave Observatory Finds More Colliding Black Holes
The second confirmation of ripples in spacetime is announced by astronomers at LIGO
- Sat Jun 11, 2016 6:04 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: 3d time
- Replies: 43
- Views: 76952
lucid dreaming
<t>Yes - and I am trying to reach those experiences. Really cool how the reality we have established as dimentsional and solid and "timefull" are likely anything but. WE make them that way by observing them. Thank you for the lively discussion and not just telling me to reread the words someone has ...
- Thu Jun 09, 2016 5:09 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Dimensions in the Reciprocal System
- Replies: 80
- Views: 127384
confused but learning
<t>I was attracted to RS because of its simplicity in describing reality but find now that it is anything but. I also believe the rule of speed of light made no sense as the top speed. Again another reason I find RS interesting. But the details as above seem to be tangled in words and concepts and l...
- Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:48 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: 3d time
- Replies: 43
- Views: 76952
read them
So no explanation of moving in Cosmic 3d time. Maybe I missed it. seems illogical and no practical way to describe.
- Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:45 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: more on gravitational waves?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 20795
sci am
Yes - I agree but it makes good copy? It states in the article how close all of this is too Brownian motion and how they figured out how to take that out. Really? How?
- Tue Jun 07, 2016 1:56 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: more on gravitational waves?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 20795
more on gravitational waves?
<r><URL url="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/lisa-pathfinder-reports-record-breaking-gravitational-wave-results/?WT.mc_id=SA_DD_20160607"><LINK_TEXT text="http://www.scientificamerican.com/artic ... D_20160607">http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/lisa-pathfinder-reports-record-breaki...
- Mon May 30, 2016 7:46 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: 3d time
- Replies: 43
- Views: 76952
RS theory
<t>Well said. I have read more than half the papers posted on this site and will look at your site. I do agree modern main stream physics seems to just find more questions and created more contrivances to make their ideas "real". We spend billions looking for the building blocks of the universe and ...
- Sun May 29, 2016 4:36 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: 3d time
- Replies: 43
- Views: 76952
3d time
<t>thank you for seeing what I believe is the obvious failing in this theory and many others like it - the proponents see it as self evident and when asked why point to other papers and say its just so. Why it does explain some things it leaves others open to many more questions than answers. faster...