Reciprocal System Research Society

This is not meant to be a formal definition. That is beyond me at this point in my development. There exists the distinct possibility this derivation is wrong and/or false (hope not!). Please check my work. Simple integration over time yields this Newtonian classic: v (s/t) = a (s/t 2 ) × t Given: a...

Similar on NY Post:
https://nypost.com/2019/04/26/the-unive ... s-thought/

Points here for underlying study.

Principal Quantum Number

This must be the magnetic ionization level although we know this can't go to infinity.
Limit is 4-4?

Angular Momentum (Secondary, Azimunthal) Quantum Number (l) Is not angular momentum in the time region just another way of saying mass (i.e. equivalent energy) in equivalent space? Momentum is defined as t 2 /s 2 and being angular increases the observed dimensionality in equivalent space (is this a...

Spin Quantum Number: Specifies the orientation of the spin axis of an electron. An electron can spin in only one of two directions (sometimes called up and down). Instead, let's call these inward and outward (in space or time). The Pauli exclusion principle (Wolfgang Pauli, Nobel Prize 1945) states ...

More... In a ground state configuration, all of the electrons are in as low an energy level as it is possible for them to be. When an electron absorbs energy, it occupies a higher energy orbital, and is said to be in an excited state. Increase in energy is recognized as increase in aspect of motion ...

Would appreciate some discussion on the below points as translation from execu-speak to RS2 often requires thoughtful consideration. The electrons in the outermost shell (the ones with the highest value of n) are the most energetic, and are the ones which are exposed to other atoms. This shell is kn...

https://www.cnet.com/news/universe-is-expanding-faster-than-we-thought-and-no-one-knows-why/ It's become clear that something in the cosmos just doesn't add up. Hard to add things up and get the right value if you are adding wrong numbers. In fact, it's expanding at a much faster rate than it should...

Has someone had a talk with Miles Mathis? This guy is an undercover shill for RS2 and he doesn't even know it. Firstly, if you haven't already, scoot on over here and take a look at his derivation of tangential velocity. Let me save you the suspense. v = ω/r Yes, the inverse of v = ω×r Thus, r = ω/v...

duane wrote: ↑Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:24 am so what are they seeing?

There's a joke here somewhere.